Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $R$ is a domain, finitely generated over an algebraically closed field, and $\mathfrak{m}\subset R$ is a maximal ideal. Is $\underleftarrow{\lim} R/\mathfrak{m}^n$ necessarily a domain?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

This phenomenon of posing a question in the title and the posing its negation in the body is very curious to me. Anyway, it is possible for the completion of a domain to be a non-domain.

Let $R = k[x, y]/(y^2 - x^3 - x^2)$ where $k$ is a field of characteristic not equal to $2$ and let $\mathfrak{m} = (x, y)$. In the completion $\sqrt{1 + x}$ exists (e.g. by Hensel's lemma, or more explicitly by the binomial theorem) and consequently the defining polynomial admits a factorization

$$(y - x \sqrt{1 + x})(y + x \sqrt{1 + x})$$

so the completion has a zero divisor. This corresponds geometrically to the fact that $y^2 = x^3 + x^2$ has a singularity at the origin (the curve looks locally like an intersection of a pair of lines and this can be detected by completing with respect to $\mathfrak{m}$).

For a number-theoretic example let $R = \mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2 + 3)$ and let $\mathfrak{m} = (2, x + 1)$. In the completion $\sqrt{1 - 4}$ exists in $\mathbb{Z}_2$ (again by either Hensel's lemma or the binomial theorem), so the same argument as above produces a zero divisor. Morally speaking this is for the same reason as above: $\text{Spec } R$ is singular at $\mathfrak{m}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Hmm, is this true for all singular points? (As in, is the completion of a finite dimension local ring an integral domain if and only if the local ring is regular?) – only Aug 25 '12 at 1:00
@only: I don't think so. Consider $k[x, y]/(y^2 - x^3)$ at $\mathfrak{m} = (x, y)$. It seems to me that the completion is still a domain (it just fails to be integrally closed). – Qiaochu Yuan Aug 25 '12 at 1:03
The phenomenon occurs because people don't want to sound repetitive. – Kevin Aug 25 '12 at 1:15

The two examples given by Qiaochu are singular points, one gives rise to a domain when passing to the completion but not the other. What makes the difference ?

Consider the normalization morphism of $\mathrm{Spec}(R)$. In both cases the normalization is the affine line parametrized by $t:=y/x$. For the first curve, there are two points in the affine line lying over the singular point $x=y=0$: they are given by $t=1$ and $t=-1$. In the second case, there is only one point $t=0$ lying over the singular point. This actually characterizes the integrality:

Let $A$ be a noetherian integral domain. Suppose $A$ is excellent (e.g. $A$ is a localization of a finitely generated algebra over either a field or $\mathbb Z$). Let $B$ be the integral closure of $A$. Let $m$ be a maximal ideal of $A$. Then the $m$-adic completion $\hat{A}$ is a domain if and only if there is only one maximal ideal of $B$ lying over $m$.

Proof. By the excellent hypothesis, $B$ is finite over $A$. Let $m_1, \dots, m_n$ be the maximal ideals of $B$ lying over $A$. A second fact resulting from the excellent hypothesis is that $B$ is excellent, and the normalization commutes with the completion. In particular, the ($m_i$-adic) completion of $B_{m_i}$ is integrally closed. It is an integral domain because it is integrally closed and connected (it is a local ring).

Let $K=\mathrm{Frac}(A)$. Then $B\subseteq K$. By the flatness of $A\to \hat{A}$, we have $$\hat{A}\subseteq \hat{A}\otimes_A B\subseteq \hat{A}\otimes_A K\subseteq \mathrm{Frac}(\hat{A})$$ where the last Frac denotes the total ring of fractions. We conclude that $\hat{A}$ is a domain if and only if $\hat{A}\otimes_A B$ is a domain.

Finally, as a general fact, there is a canonical isomorphism $$ \hat{A}\otimes_A B \simeq \hat{B}=\prod_{1\le i\le n} \widehat{(B_{m_i})}$$ where $\hat{B}$ denotes the $mB$-adic completion of $B$. Therefore, $\hat{A}\otimes_A B$ (hence $\hat{A}$) is a domain if and only if $n=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.