Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Say you have a right triangle, you know the length of the 2 sides of the 90 degree corner (so you know everything, the hypotenuse and all 3 angles). Inside this triangle, you draw a line (not the height) so you create 2 new (non-similar) triangles: 1 new right triangle and another one.

enter image description here

Is there something that the original big right triangle (ABD) and the new smaller triangle (ABC) have in common? I am looking for a ratio that stays constant, using some property of both triangles: angles, surface, circumference, inside circle ratio, height,... I.e. the ratio of some function of alpha / (AC/AE) = that function of beta / (AD/AF), something like that, or BC/BD= ...* some function (alpha/Beta), or ... I've looked at, but it's not clear to me. Thanks for the help!

share|cite|improve this question
$C$ can be any point on $BD$ and you can draw a diagram which works. The two triangles have side in common and are both right-angled. AB/AB=1. It would help to have some motivation for the question - why do you think there might be something the same? – Mark Bennet Aug 23 '12 at 14:16
If you throw in $\alpha$ and $\beta$, there is a large number of relationships. One can produce a few without mentioning angles. There seems to be no point in producing a random list without knowing what the aim is. – André Nicolas Aug 23 '12 at 17:49
Hi André, thanks for responding. The aim is to use this in a filter, and I need to be able to treat a variety of movements of a variable in the same way: it doesn't matter to this filter how high the variable goes up, so I must calculate something from a reference point that allows me to classify all these moves in the same category so I can ignore the difference in vertical movement. For this, I need to compare the previous movement with the current movement, and if the "ratio" that I want to calculate stays the same, then I don't need to adjust anything. – MisterH Aug 23 '12 at 19:48

There is nothing that the two triangles have in common.

Execpt one line and the right angle, but nothing else. It's a complete new triangle. There aren't any ratios or something else, that stays constant.

That wouldn't be logical.

You know, that (using Pythagorean theorem) $$\sqrt{AC^2-BC^2} = \sqrt{AD^2-BD^2}$$

share|cite|improve this answer
There is one candidate for $C$ which would make the two triangles similar, provided $AB<BD$ – Arthur Aug 23 '12 at 13:55
Shouldn't there be some sort of relationship between (alpha/beta)*AB and BC/BD? – MisterH Aug 23 '12 at 13:57
If you would think of it from a Cartesian coordinate point of view, if you start at the origin and you have a certain angle alpha, and you draw a line of a certain length, what would the angle beta be to cover the same horizontal distance (AB in my example)? – MisterH Aug 23 '12 at 14:21

enter image description here

In the $\triangle ABC$, $BE^2=AE*EC$

we, have $BE^2=BC^2-EC^2=AE*EC$

i.e. $BC^2=AC*EC$ -------(1)

In the $\triangle ACD$, $CF^2=AF*FD$

we, have $CF^2=CD^2-FD^2$

i.e. $CD^2=AD*FD$ -------(2)

Let, $a$=AREA of $\triangle ABC=\frac{1}{2}(BC)*(AB)$

Let, $b$=AREA of $\triangle ABD=\frac{1}{2}(BD)*(AB)$

we, now have, $\frac{a}{b}=\frac{BC}{BD}$ -------(3)

we, also have, $\frac{b-a}{a}=\frac{CD}{BC}$ -------(4)







share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.