Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am needing to make a detailed comparison of the affine conics in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with that of the projective conics in $\mathbf{P}^2$

could only identify:

a) classification of non-degenerate conics

b) single pt given by $x^2 + y^2 = 0$

c) line $xy=0$

(e,f,g) empty set given by $x^2 + y^2 = -1$, $x^2 = -1$ or $0 = 1$

j) parallel lines $x(x-1)=0$

k) double line $x^2 = 0$

l) plane given by $0=0$

Can someone please help on this?

share|cite|improve this question
Projective over what field? – Qiaochu Yuan Aug 23 '12 at 6:01
Okay. This looks like homework; what have you tried? – Qiaochu Yuan Aug 23 '12 at 6:14
@ZhenLin: I've removed the close flags on this question since its duplicate has been deleted. – robjohn Sep 9 '12 at 1:20

Projectively, all nondegenerate conics over the reals are equivalent. In the affine plane, you can determine whether a conic is an ellipse, a parabola or a conic by counting the points at infinity: hyperbolas have two of them, the parabola one, and ellipses none (no real ones in any case).

share|cite|improve this answer
I edited my problem better so please check it out above. Thanks – mary Sep 5 '12 at 7:13
Franz: I would count $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 0$ as a nondegenerate real projective conic. Since it has no real points, it is certainly not projectively equivalent to $x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 0$. In this standard arithmetic-geometric philosophy, there are precisely two equivalence classes of nondegenerate projective conics over $\mathbb{R}$. – Pete L. Clark Sep 9 '12 at 1:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.