Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The serie of function

$$\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}\frac{1}{{(z-n)}^2}$$

converges normally in $\mathbb C\setminus\mathbb Z$ and it defines a meromorphic simply periodic function. Now let be $\Lambda$ a lattice, then the serie $$\sum_{\omega\in\Lambda}\frac{1}{{(z-\omega)}^2}$$ doesn't converge normally in $\mathbb C\setminus \Lambda$ so it doesn't define an elliptic function. Geometrically, Why does this occur? If there is a discrete line of poles is ensured the convergence but if poles form a lattice the serie doesn't converge. I have just proved the above statements with analysis tools, but i don't understand why such two series have a so different behavior.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Take, for example, $\Lambda=\{(n,m):n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ and look at the sum for $z=0$ -- ignore $\omega=(0,0)$ for the sake of this discussion. Then you can rearrange terms so that you sum over the terms which are from the squares centered around $0$. The inner square has $8$ points contributing to the sum the next one already $16$, in general the $n$- th will contribute $2*(2n+1)+ 2*(2n-1)$ (draw a picture). So each of these squares contributes $Cn$ points, but the order of the terms is roughly $1/n^2$. In other words, the sum behaves like a harmonic series. This is basically because the number of terms of a certain magnitude is increasing, due to 2 dimensions, linearly. In one dimension the number of terms of a certain magnitude is constant.

This behaviour is similar to the behaviour you observe if you try to integrate $$\int_{|x|>1}\left(\frac{1}{|x|}\right)^k$$ in spaces of increasing dimensions. The bound for $k$, for which this converges, depends in a similar manner (for the same reason) on the dimension $n$. Technically this corresponds to a factor of $r^{n-1}$ in the volume element if written down in polar coordinates, geometrically this of course just the way the surface of the $(n-1)$-dimensional sphere scales.

In other words, this is not a question about complex analytic function. It becomes a question about these if you add terms forcing normal convergence and arrive at the Weierstrass function. But then other effects become predominant (topological ones, elliptic functions are functions on a torus).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.