Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $H$ be a Hopf algebra, $(V,\Delta_R)$ a right $H$-comodule map, and $f:V \to V$ a right $H$-comodule map. Since by definition we must have, for all $v \in V$, that $$ \Delta_R(f(v)) = \sum f(v_{(0)}) \otimes v_{(1)}, $$ it seems to me that the kernel of $f$ must be a right $H$-sub-comodule. Since for any non-zero $v \in \ker(f)$, $$ 0 = \Delta_R(0) = \Delta_R(f(v)) = \sum f(v_{(0)}) \otimes v_{(1)}. $$ Does this all seem ok?

share|cite|improve this question

By definition of a comodule, we know $$(\Delta_R\circ f)(v) = (f\otimes 1)\circ \Delta_R (v) = \sum_{(v)} f(v_{(0)})\otimes v_{(1)}.$$

To show that $\ker f$ is a subcomodule of $V$, we need to show that $\Delta_R(\ker f) \subset \ker f \otimes H$.

As you correctly noticed for $v\in \ker f$ one gets $(f\otimes 1)\Delta_R(v) = 0$. But over a field $v\otimes w=0$ if and only if $v=0$ or $w=0$. So $\Delta_R(v)$ must in fact lie in $\ker f\otimes H$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.