Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the proof that: $x\left ( 1-y \right )+y\left ( 1-z \right )+z\left ( 1-x \right )< 1$

if: $0< x;y;z< 1$

share|cite|improve this question

Look at the cubic polynomial $P(t)$, where $$P(t)=t^3-(x+y+z)t^2+(xy+yz+zx)t-xyz.$$ This has as its roots $x$, $y$, and $z$. These are all less than $1$, so $P$ is positive at $1$ (and beyond). Now you can get the required result from $$P(1)=1-(x+y+z)+(xy+yz+zx)-xyz \gt 0.$$

share|cite|improve this answer
I am admirative of this elegant solution. Out of curiosity, how did you come up with it? – S4M Aug 21 '12 at 21:02
Exploiting the connection between symmetric functions and roots is I think a fairly standard trick. – André Nicolas Aug 21 '12 at 21:27

André’s solution is much nicer, but the problem can also be solved in a more routine fashion. Let $a=x+y$; then

$$\begin{align*} x(1-y)+y(1-z)+z(1-x)&=x(1-a+x)+(a-x)(1-z)+z(1-x)\\ &=x^2-ax+a+(1-a)z\\ &=\left(x-\frac{a}2\right)^2+a+(1-a)z\;.\tag{1} \end{align*}$$

If $a\le 1$, the third term is bounded above by $(1-a)\cdot1=1-a$, and since $0<x<a$, the first term is strictly bounded above by its value when $x=a$, so $(1)$ is strictly bounded above by $$\left(a-\frac{a}2\right)^2+a+1-a-\frac{a^2}4=1\;,$$ as desired.

If $a>1$, the third term is strictly bounded above by $0$, and $a-1<x<1$, so $(1)$ is strictly bounded above by

$$\left(a-1-\frac{a}2\right)^2+a-\frac{a^2}4=\left(\frac{a}2-1\right)^2+a-\frac{a^2}4=1\;,$$ again as desired.

The idea behind this approach is to see how the function varies with $z$ when $x$ and $y$ are held constant. Once quickly discovers that when $x+y=1$, its value is independent of $z$, when $x+y<1$ it increases as $z$ increases, and when $x+y>1$ it increases as $z$ decreases. This suggests fixing not $x$ and $y$, but $x+y$, evaluating the function at $z=1$ or $z=0$ to check that it’s bounded above by $1$, and then making sure that the bound is strict.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.