Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm reading E.J Barbeau Polynomials. I'm in a page where he asks a polynomial of degree $-\infty$. Then I thought about $77x^{-\infty}+1$, but when I went for the answers, the answer to this question was zero.

Then I thought about making $n^{-\infty}$ on Mathematica and it outputed $Indeterminate$ as a result.

I thought the problem was in my understanding of exponantiation, then I tried to "algebrize" it. (I guess that's the name of the procedure)

Then I thought:

$2^3=\overbrace{2\cdot 2\cdot 2}^{\text{3 times}}$

That would lead me to:

$a^b=\overbrace{a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot ...}^{\text{b times}}$

And in this case:

$a^{-\infty}=\overbrace{a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot ...}^{{-\infty}\text{ times}}$

But this gave me no insight of what could be done to better understand this. I can't see why $n^{-\infty}=0$ so clearly.

With the last example, I'm thinking that there will be no $a$'s to multiply, can you help me?

Addendum:

I thought about some other thing:

$$2^{-8}=\frac{1}{256}=\frac{1}{2^8}$$

Then considering this example, I would get: $$a^{-\infty}=\frac{1}{\infty}=0$$ Right?

share|improve this question
    
Well, negative powers are defined as $x^{-k} := \frac{1}{x^k}$. Thus, you can define $$ x^{-\infty} := \lim\limits_{k\to+\infty}\frac{1}{x^k} $$ and since for $|x|>1$ the absolute value of $x^k$ grows unboundedly with $k\to\infty$, you obtain that $x^{-\infty} = 0$ whenever $|x|>1$. –  Ilya Aug 21 '12 at 10:49
    
Consider $$\lim_{k\to\infty}\frac1{a^k}$$ –  J. M. Aug 21 '12 at 10:50
5  
Surely the point is that we (some of us, rather) conventionally define the polynomial $0$ to have degree $-\infty$, so that formulae like $\deg(pq) = \deg(p)+\deg(q)$ continue to hold. –  Sean Eberhard Aug 21 '12 at 10:52
    
@Gustavo: would you please give a hint, are you looking for the reasons for $0$ to be a polynomial of the degree $-\infty$, or your question is different? It is not that clear from your post. –  Ilya Aug 21 '12 at 13:15
1  
It sounds like the question in the book was "What polynomial should we define to have degree $-\infty$ ?" As it's not a mathematical question and has a "come up with the same opinion I already have" feel, it's a rather poor question in my opinion. –  MartianInvader Aug 21 '12 at 17:24

4 Answers 4

up vote 21 down vote accepted

IMO it comes down to conventions. We say the zero polynomial has degree $-\infty$. Let's see why this is a good convention:

Usually the degree is the highest power with a non-vanishing coefficient. Following this logic it is not really clear what the degree of the zero-polynomial should be. We could just say it has no degree, or we could say it is just a special case of a degree $0$ polynomial (i.e. a constant polynomial), or maybe it's something different?

What properties does the degree have? More specifically what happens if I add or multiply two polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree, say, $n$ and $m$?

You can check that the degree of the sum of $P$ and $Q$ will be smaller or equal to the maximum of the degrees of $P$ and $Q$, while the product will have degree $m+n$.

In particular if we multiply any polynomial $P$ with the zero polynomial we want:

$$\deg 0=\deg P\cdot 0=\deg P+ \deg 0$$

To make sense of this equation $\deg 0$ has to be $\pm \infty$ but $+\infty$ doesn't agree with the property for sums. So $-\infty$ remains as the only sensible choice.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes. I imagined this: $ax^2+bx^1+c^0$ which is a second degree polynomial if at least $a\neq 0$. If $(a=0)$ then it's a first degree polynomial, if $(a=b=0)$ it's a zero degree polynomial, if $(a=b=c=0)$ we have a polynomial of degree $-\infty$. –  Vladimir Putin Aug 21 '12 at 23:02
    
I got one doubt with this: If my suggested polynomial is going to be evaluated, I'm will meet some trouble on the $c\,$ term, since $c^0=1$ (and I know that the $c\,$ term could be $\neq 1$). I guess that $ax^2+bx^1+cd^0$ would be more adequate, isn't it? –  Vladimir Putin Aug 21 '12 at 23:37
    
It's $ax^2+bx^1+cx^0=ax^2+bx+c$ –  Simon Markett Aug 22 '12 at 8:20

Turn back to the beginning of the first chapter, a page or so before the problem you're attempting, and you should find Barbeau's definition of degree. It contains the words "a nonzero constant polynomial has degree $0$, but, by convention, the zero polynomial (all coefficients vanishing) has degree $-\infty$." The question then becomes rather easy.

share|improve this answer
    
Then 0 is a polynomial? –  Vladimir Putin Aug 21 '12 at 11:04
    
@GustavoBandeira Maybe the question is, what is $0$? Is the zero polynomial the same thing as the natural number $0$, as the real number $0$,...? –  Simon Markett Aug 21 '12 at 11:07
    
This is one of the reasons which led me to think about that a polynomial is similar to a number –  Vladimir Putin Aug 21 '12 at 11:13
    
Gustavo: Sorry but a polynomial is not a number (nor a function, by the way), but a sequence $(a_n)_{n\geqslant0}$ with values in a given ring, with the property that the set $\{n\mid a_n\ne0\}$ is finite. And this sequence, when viewed as a polynomial, is often denoted by $\sum\limits_na_nX^n$ by convention. –  Did Aug 21 '12 at 12:37
    
@SimonMarkett set-wise: $\Bbb{N} \subset \Bbb{N}[x].$ –  user2468 Aug 21 '12 at 13:35

You can write $n^{-\infty}=(\frac{1}{n})^{\infty}$ and if $|n|>1$ then you will get

$$\lim_{k\rightarrow -\infty}n^{k}=0$$ As $|n|<1$ then $$\lim_{k\rightarrow -\infty}n^{k}=\infty$$ thats why $77x^{-\infty}+1$ is undefined.

share|improve this answer
    
You might mean $|n|\gt1$ instead of $|n|\lt1$, whatever the relevance of your remark to the question asked. –  Did Aug 21 '12 at 13:07
    
@did: it's not clear from the OP whether it asks about reasons for $0$ to be the polynomial of the degree $-\infty$, or why $n^{-\infty} = \mathsf{Indeterminate}$, or why $n^{-\infty} = 0$ (whatever the value of $n$ is meant in the latter expression). Moreover, I would say that the former meaning seems to be less probable given the text of OP (especially when updated). –  Ilya Aug 21 '12 at 13:12
    
@Seyhmus: you may want to mention that $n^{-\infty} = \infty$ for $n\in (0,1)$ which is one of the reasons, why $77x^{-\infty}$ is undefined. –  Ilya Aug 21 '12 at 13:13
    
@Ilya thanks for the comment. –  Seyhmus Güngören Aug 21 '12 at 13:21

In the division algorithm for polynomials you want to divide $f$ by a non-zero polynomial $g$ and get a remainder $r$ of smaller degree than tat of $g$: $f=qg+r $ where $q, r$ are polynomials and $\deg(r)<\deg(g)$. In case $\deg(g)=0$, i.e. $g$ is a non-zero constant then $r=0$, $\deg(r)=\deg(0)=-\infty$ makes this all work out nicely.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.