Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking at the equation of a line and its plot. I can intuitively see what these operations do to the plot's form: adding a constant, multiplying by a constant, adding a parametrised value, etc. For some simple conic functions, I am able to do the same, almost as intuitively, although not always. When I consider higher order polynomials, the effects vary to the point of not being able to recognize the original plot anymore. Is there a general definition for what effect multiplying for a constant has on a function's plot? I am using gnuplot and/or octave to play around with this (should I be using something else?) and still, for some function, I can see the effects and understand them (e.g. This "amplifies the oscillation range", this "contracts" this part of the curve, etc. but is there a more general way of making estimations about what will happen to the function's plot?)

share|improve this question
    
When you say "multiplication by a constant", do you mean $y=k\times f(x)$, $y= f(k \times x)$, or something else? –  Henry Aug 20 '12 at 20:48
    
y = f(x) k, sorry. Is k not called a multiplicative constant in this case? –  Robottinosino Aug 20 '12 at 20:50
    
If $k > 1$ (resp. $0 < k < 1$) then it stretches (resp. shrinks) the plot in the $y$-axis direction. If $k$ is negative then it's the same $+$ mirroring about $x$-axis. –  user2468 Aug 20 '12 at 21:02
add comment

1 Answer

For a positive value $k$, the graph of $y = kf(x)$ is obtained from the graph of $y=f(x)$ by scaling in the vertical direction. In coordinates, if $(x_0, y_0)$ is on the graph of $y=f(x)$, then that point moves to $(x_0, ky_0)$ on the graph of $y=kf(x)$. Any point on the $x$-axis remains fixed (as then $y=0$). When $k > 1$, the graph is stretched vertically (away from the $x$-axis), while if $0 < k < 1$, the graph is compressed vertically (toward the $x$-axis).

Another way to think about this: The graph of $y=kf(x)$ is exactly the same as the graph of $y=f(x)$ if the $y$-axis is scaled so that $1$ is relabeled $k$, $2 \mapsto 2k$, $-1 \mapsto -k$, etc.

Hope this helps!

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.