Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Question: If we have a limit point for the set of zeros which is on the boundary of our domain $D$, does the (complex analysis) identity theorem still hold?

Motivation: The identity theorem states that if two holomorphic functions agree at a limit point in $D$, then they are equivalent. I'm fairly sure that if the limit point is on the boundary, then one could use something like the Riemann Removable Singularity Theorem to "get rid of" all of the points converging to our limit point on the boundary. I just wanted to check.

Example: Let $D = B(1,1)$, the ball of radius 1, centered at 1. Suppose that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$ and has zeros at $\frac{1}{n}$ for each $n\in {\mathbb N}$. Is it the case that $f\equiv 0$?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

It is not enough for the limit point to be on the boundary. Consider the analytic function $\sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ on the domain $(0, 1)$. Then we can choose a sequence $x_n = \frac{1}{\pi n} \rightarrow 0$ such that $f(x_n) = 0\ \forall n$ but the function is clearly non-zero.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.