Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In this page is the definition of an inductively open map. But in this pdf is the definition of a inductively P map, where P is a property of maps.

But there is a difference in the definitions. In the former it's said that "the image of the subset is the same as the image of the whole space," but in the other it's said symbolically that the image of the subset is the entire codomain space.

It's more credible that the terminology of the paper is the correct, but in some papers is used nonstandard terminology and I'm a little bit confused. What is the meaning of the term "inductively P map" is the sense of the paper standard or is the other page correct? and in any case what is the terminology of the other case?

share|improve this question
    
a) Please don't use exclamation marks like that in the title; imagine what the main page would look like if everyone did that. No information is being conveyed in that punctuation. b) Please make the title more specific. "What is the correct term?" would fit very many terminology questions. In fact it doesn't even really fit yours, since you're mainly looking for the meaning of a term you already know. Why not use a title like e.g. "What's an inductively $\mathcal P$ map?" –  joriki Aug 20 '12 at 3:53
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

There's no conflict between the two definitions, since the one in the paper refers to a map onto the codomain, so in this case the image of the domain is the entire codomain.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.