Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would like to know what you think about this question. It is a "self-posed" question: I formulated it while I was doing an exercise.

Suppose you have $(f_n)_{n\ \in \mathbb N}\subset L^1(\mathbb R^2)$ such that $f_n \to 0$ in $L^1(\mathbb R^2)$.

Is it true that there exists a subsequence $f_{n_k}$ such that $f_{n_k}(x,\cdot)\to 0$ in $L^1(\mathbb R)$ for almost every $x \in \mathbb R$?

share|improve this question
1  
I like it very much... find it interesting and appealing, moreover it reflects the fact that you understand the subject.. +1 –  uforoboa Aug 17 '12 at 13:47
    
@uforoboa Glad you liked it. Thanks a lot! –  Romeo Aug 20 '12 at 9:27

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The answer is yes. Let $g_n(x) = \int_{\mathbb R}|f_n(x,y)|\,dy$. Then your condition is equivalent to saying that $g_n \to 0$ in $L^1(\mathbb R)$. It is a standard fact from measure theory that if a sequence of functions on ${\mathbb R}$ converges in $L^p$, then it has a subsequence that converges pointwise a.e. to the same limit. So we can extract a subsequence $g_{n_k}(x)$ that converges pointwise a.e. to 0, which is the same as saying $f_{n_k}(x,\cdot) \to 0$ in $L^1({\mathbb R})$ for a.e. $x$.

share|improve this answer
    
The current answer should be correct. –  Zarrax Aug 17 '12 at 17:31
    
I will read it in a minute; On another note, I think that if you post an answer, get upvotes, and then realize that it was mistaken and instead come up with a correct one, you should delete it and post the correct answer separately (so that the new answer does not get upvotes from previous, incorrect one). –  tomasz Aug 17 '12 at 17:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.