Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $Z$ be the ring of integers, $p$ a prime and $F_p = Z/pZ$ the field with $p$ elements. Let $x$ be an indeterminate. Set $R_1 = F_p[x]/(x^2-2)$, $R_2 = F_p[x]/(x^2-3)$. Determine whether the rings $R_1$ and $R_2$ are isomorphic in each of the following cases:

(a) $p = 2$

(b) $p = 5$

(c) $p = 11$

I'm pretty sure about my answer to (c), but not very sure about (a) & (b). Any comments would be greatly appreciated for PhD Quals prep. Thank you.

Attempt at Solution:

(c) When $p = 11$, $x^2 - 2$ is irreducible but $x^2 - 3$ is reducible [2 is a quadratic nonresidue mod 11; 3 is a quadratic residue]. So $(x^2 - 2)$ is a maximal ideal and hence $R_1$ is a field, whereas $R_2$ is not. So they are not isomorphic.

(b) When $p = 5$, both $x^2 - 2$ and $x^2 - 3$ are irreducible, so both $R_1$ and $R_2$ are fields. As any polynomial in $R_1$ or $R_2$ of degree $\ge2$ is equal to some polynomial of degree 0 or 1, effectively, the elements of $R_1$ and $R_2$ can be represented by $a_0 + a_1x$, where $a_0, a_1 \in 0,1,2,3,4$. So $R_1 = R_2 =$ Finite field with $5^2$ elements, i.e. they are isomorphic.

(a) When $p=2$, both $x^2 - 2 = x^2$ and $x^2 - 3 = x^2-1$ are reducible. So although $R_1$ and $R_2$ can each be represented by $a_0 + a_1x$, where $a_0, a_1 \in 0,1$ , I am not sure whether each of them is isomorphic to $Z/4Z$ or the Klein 4-group.

share|improve this question
Dear Conan, concerning your last sentence, be very careful: the question is about rings not groups. An $\mathbb F_2$- algebra will never be isomorphic to $\mathbb Z/4\mathbb Z$, but that is irrelevant: $\mathbb F_2/(x^2+x+1)$ and $\mathbb F_2/(x^2)$ both have the Klein group as underlying group but yet they are not isomorphic as rings . –  Georges Elencwajg Aug 15 '12 at 9:51
Thanks Georges - sadly I have to admit that I have made a similar mistake before. Thank you for the reminder. –  Conan Wong Aug 15 '12 at 14:08

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

(a) $R_1 = F_p[t]$, where $t$ is the image of $x$. $R_2 = F_p[s]$, where $s$ is the image of $x + 1$. Since $t^2 = 0$ and $s^2 = 0$, $R_1$ and $R_2$ are isomorphic.

(b) and (c) were solved by you.

share|improve this answer
Thank you Makoto. –  Conan Wong Aug 15 '12 at 14:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.