Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently found a question about a property of the Minkowski sums. However the question was not properly answered (it used a projection argument which might not be true in a general Banach space).

I was wondering whether the following (weaker) statement holds:

Let $X$ be a Banach space and suppose $A,B,C_0\subset X$ are bounded, closed, convex and non-empty subset. Do we then have $$A+C_0=B+C_0\implies A=B?$$

share|improve this question
1  
what is the difference with that question? –  no identity Aug 14 '12 at 20:03
    
There is an equality symbol instead of an inclusion, which makes this statement stronger –  gifty Aug 14 '12 at 20:12
2  
This statement is weaker, not stronger. Yours immediately follows from the other one (as shown in the answer) while the other one doesn't follow from yours. I find it objectionable to call the other question not properly answered, as the easy fix was presented in a comment while joriki's answer gave the important geometric intuition. –  t.b. Aug 14 '12 at 20:34
1  
I've now fixed my answer to the other question. –  joriki Aug 18 '12 at 4:55

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Modulo result presented in this question the solution is extremely simple $$ A+C_0=B+C_0\Longleftrightarrow (A+C_0\subset B+C_0)\wedge(B+C_0\subset A+C_0)\Longrightarrow $$ $$ (A\subset B)\wedge (B\subset A)\Longleftrightarrow A=B $$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.