Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A silly question, but I don't see the answer. This question is from Rudin's Functional Analysis, Chapter 10, Exercise 1a).

It's obvious that $y$ has a left inverse as $((xy)^{-1}x)y=e$, where $e$ is the unit of the algebra. However, starting with $y((xy)^{-1}x)$, I cannot proceed further. Does this suggest that I need to 'venture beyond' the multiplicative group structure, maybe introduce ideas from the ring structure on the Banach Algebra? ( I'm thinking of something analogous to the proof where $e-xy$ is invertible if and only if $e-yx$ is invertible. There, if $z$ is the inverse of $e-xy$, then, $e+yzx$ is the inverse of $e-yx$.)

share|cite|improve this question
Hint: a product of two invertible elements is certainly invertible. Given the information you have, can you write y as the product of two invertible elements? – Manny Reyes Aug 13 '12 at 20:28

I am guessing you meant Exercise 2(a)?

Let $p = y((xy)^{-1}x)$, then $xp = xy((xy)^{-1}x) = x$, since $x$ is invertible, it follows that $p=e$.

share|cite|improve this answer

The inverse of $x^{-1}xy$ is $(xy)^{-1}x$, since $x^{-1}xy\cdot (xy)^{-1}x=e$ and $(xy)^{-1}xx^{-1}xy=e$. Hence $y$ is invertible.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.