Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

SGA I.3 claims the following three properties of a finite type morphism $X \rightarrow Y$ are equivalent (Let $x \in X$, $y = f(x)$:

Let $A$ be the stalk of $X$ at $x$, and $B$ be the stalk of $Y$ at $y$. Let $m_a, m_b$ be their respective maximal ideals. The morphism of sheaves then determines a morphism $g$ of local rings in the other direction.

i.) $g(m_b)$ generates $m_a$, and $\frac{A}{m_a}$ is a finite separable extension of $\frac{B}{m_b}.$

ii.)The stalk of $\Omega^1_{X/Y}$ is 0 at $x$.

iii.)The diagonal morphism is an open immersion in a neighborhood of $x$.

I don't understand their proof that i.) implies ii.); It is just written that Nakayama's immediately reduces it to the case where X and Y are spectrums of fields. Can anyone please elaborate?

share|cite|improve this question
The "proof" you mention is anything but: the case of fields is trivial and saying that you "instantly" reduce to that case is not in the least helpful (as your very question attests) . Of course you can also say that Hironaka's proof of desingularization of schemes in characteristic zero instantly reduces to a sequence of blowing-ups... – Georges Elencwajg Aug 11 '12 at 12:38
Hmm, perhaps my translation of SGA is bad; it is written "on est ramené aussitôt par Nakayama au cas où $Y = Spec(k)$, $X = Spec(k').$ I know aussitôt means immediately (which probably would have been a better word than instantly) and ramené means reduced. – only Aug 11 '12 at 16:06
up vote 2 down vote accepted

We may assume that $X=Spec(S), Y=Spec(R)$ are affine.
Let $\phi : R\to S$ be the ring morphism corresponding to $f:X=Spec(S)\to Y= Spec(R)$.
The points $x\in X, y\in Y$ correspond to prime ideals $\mathfrak q\subset S$ and $\mathfrak p=f^{-1}(\mathfrak q)\subset S$.
The hypothesis implies that $\phi$ induces a finite separable extension $\bar \phi:\kappa (\mathfrak p)\to \kappa(\mathfrak q)$ of the residual fields, and separability of this finite extension implies that $\Omega_{\kappa(\mathfrak q)/\kappa (\mathfrak p)}=0$.

Now $\Omega_{\kappa(\mathfrak q)/\kappa (\mathfrak p)}=\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}/ \phi(\mathfrak p) \Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}$ by base change and thus $0=\Omega_{\kappa(\mathfrak q)/\kappa (\mathfrak p)}=\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}/ \phi(\mathfrak p) \Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}=\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}/ \mathfrak q \Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}$, the last equality due to $\phi(\mathfrak p)S_{\mathfrak q}=\mathfrak qS_{\mathfrak q}$.
Hence Nakayama may be applied to the module $\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}$ over the local ring $S_\mathfrak q$:
from $\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}/ \mathfrak q \Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}=0$ we conclude that $\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}=0$.
Finally we need only remark that $(\Omega_{X/Y})_x=\Omega_{S_\mathfrak q/R_\mathfrak p}$ to obtain the required equality $(\Omega_{X/Y})_x=0$

A reminder in field theory
I used that a separable algebraic extension of fields $k\subset K$ has trivial module of Kähler differentials: $\Omega _{K/k}=0$.
Indeed, if $d:K\to \Omega _{K/k}$ is the universal derivation and if $a\in K$ has minimal polynomial $f(x)$ over $k$, then $f(a)=0$ implies $d(f(a))=f'(a)da=0$, and so $da=0$ since $f'(a)\neq 0$ by separability of $a$.
Since $da=0$ holds for all $a\in K$ we conclude that $\Omega _{K/k}=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.