Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$\gamma$ is the lower incomplete gamma function. Is $\gamma(1, x) \ge \gamma(k, kx)$ when $k \in Z^+$, $x \in (0,1)$?

share|cite|improve this question
Have you tried anything? – Ravi Aug 10 '12 at 23:07
@Fortuon: I don't know if your question is serious, but I tried some algebra, some calculus, wolfram alpha, and googling for bounds. – martin Aug 10 '12 at 23:14
Welcome to Math.Stackexchange! It is often helpful if you list/describe what you have already done, so that potential answerers can see the dead ends you have been in and avoid them. – Ravi Aug 10 '12 at 23:17
Have you seen this, by any chance? – J. M. Aug 11 '12 at 0:42
@J.M. yes I saw that when I was "googling for bounds" but I was not able to convert it into a solution... – martin Aug 11 '12 at 1:22

It doesn't appear to be the case.

Addendum: Notice that $\gamma(1,x) = 1-e^{-x}$, so $\gamma(1,x) < 1$ for $x\in(0,1)$. But $$\gamma(k,k x) \sim \frac{(k x e^{-x})^k}{k(1-x)} \qquad (k\to\infty).$$ (See DLMF 8.11.6.) Thus, for any $x\in(0,1)$ we can find a $k$ large enough so $\gamma(k,k x) > 1 > \gamma(1,x)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.