Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading a proof of that claim mentioned in the title and I have some difficulties understanding it.


$$O_f(x_0)=0 \iff f \ \ \text{is continuous on} \ \ x_0 $$

(Where oscillation, $O_f(x):= \displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\text{diam}f(D(x,\frac{1}{n}) $ and where $D(x,\frac{1}{n})$ is an open ball with center $x$ and radius $\frac{1}{n}$)


Suppose that $O_f(x_o)=0$.

Let $V$ be some neighborhood of $f(x_0)$. Exist $\epsilon>0$ which for him $D(f(x_0,\epsilon))\subseteq V$. From $O_f(x_o)=0$, we know that there is $k\in\mathbb{N}$, that from that $k$ and on, $\text{diam}f(D(x,\frac{1}{n}))<\epsilon$ we choose $n>k$. For all $x\in D(x_0,\frac{1}{n})$ we have: $$d(f(x),f(x_0))\leq \text{diam}f(D(x,\frac{1}{n})<\epsilon$$ and therefor(which I can't understand): $$f(D(x_0,\frac{1}{n}))\subseteq D(f(x_0),\epsilon)$$

That last claim completes the proof(of first direction)

So, again -- how from $d(f(x),f(x_0))\leq \text{diam}f(D(x,\frac{1}{n})<\epsilon$ implies that $f(D(x_0,\frac{1}{n}))\subseteq D(f(x_0),\epsilon)$?

Thank you!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The diameter of a set in a metric space is the supremum of the distances between all its points, so in your definition of oscillation we have this: $$\mathcal O_f(x_0)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\sup_{x,y\in D\left(x_0,1/n\right)}d\left(f(x),f(y)\right)$$ and since the following inequality is true $$d\left(f(x),f(x_0)\right)\leq \textrm{diam} f\left(D\left(x_0,\frac{1}{n}\right)\right)$$ it also holds for the supremum, from which the inclusion you ask about follows.

Added to answer the OP's doubt below:

Because we took any $\,x\in D(x_0,1/n)\,$ and we got $$d(f(x),f(x_0))\leq \text{diam} f(D(x_0,1/n))<\epsilon\Longrightarrow$$ and this means $\,f\,$ maps any element of $D(x_0,1/n)\,$ , namely $\,x\,$ , to the element $\,f(x)\,$ which is within a distance of $\,\epsilon\,$ from $\,f(x_0)\,$ , i.e. to the open ball $\,D(f(x_0),\epsilon)\,$...!

In other words, all the elements in $\,D(x_0,1/n)\,$ are mapped by $\,f\,$ to elements within a distance of $\,\epsilon\,$ from $\,f(x_0)\,$ , i.e. are mapped into the ball $\,D(f(x_0),\epsilon)\,$

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes, that is clear to me. And maybe I was unclear in may problem. I'm asking, why $f(D(x_0,\frac{1}{n}))\subseteq D(f(x_0),\epsilon)$ follows from that inequality..? – Salech Alhasov Aug 9 '12 at 4:16
Think I got it! Thanks! – Salech Alhasov Aug 9 '12 at 15:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.