# Cardinality of the set of all real functions of real variable

How does one compute the cardinality of the set of functions $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ (not necessarily continuous)?

-
You have used the assumption that the Cardinality of power set of R is equal to the Cardinality of functions from real to {0,1}. How to we prove that as well? – user39246 Sep 2 '12 at 10:59
@krishnanem: Please ask new questions in a new thread, rather than as an answer to a previous question. Furthermore, this question was asked and answered several times before. – Asaf Karagila Sep 2 '12 at 11:17
@AsafKaragila: I have moved this non-answer to a comment so that krishnanem can pose it as a new question and can read your comment. – robjohn Sep 2 '12 at 20:39
@robjohn: I think Michael's comment would have been a more suitable choice over mine. – Asaf Karagila Sep 2 '12 at 21:44
@AsafKaragila: The point is to have krishnanem post the comment as a new question. Your comment solely addresses that point. Michael's also addresses the misplaced question and might encourage a reply. – robjohn Sep 3 '12 at 3:18

All you need is a few basics of cardinal arithmetic: if $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ are cardinals, none of them zero, and at least one of them is infinite, then $\kappa+\lambda = \kappa\lambda = \max\{\kappa,\lambda\}$. And cardinal exponentiation satisfies some of the same laws as regular exponentiation; in particular, $(\kappa^{\lambda})^{\nu} = \kappa^{\lambda\nu}$.

The cardinality of the set of all real functions is then $$|\mathbb{R}|^{|\mathbb{R}|} =\mathfrak{c}^{\mathfrak{c}} = (2^{\aleph_0})^{2^{\aleph_0}} = 2^{\aleph_02^{\aleph_0}} = 2^{2^{\aleph_0}} = 2^{\mathfrak{c}}.$$ In other words, it is equal to the cardinality of the power set of $\mathbb{R}$.

With a few extra facts, you can get more. In general, if $\kappa$ is an infinite cardinal, and $2\leq\lambda\leq\kappa$, then $\lambda^{\kappa}=2^{\kappa}$. This follows because: $$2^{\kappa} \leq \lambda^{\kappa} \leq (2^{\lambda})^{\kappa} = 2^{\lambda\kappa} = 2^{\kappa},$$ so you get equality throughout. The extra information you need for this is to know that if $\kappa$, $\lambda$, and $\nu$ are nonzero cardinals, $\kappa\leq\lambda$, then $\kappa^{\nu}\leq \lambda^{\nu}$.

In particular, for any infinite cardinal $\kappa$ you have $\kappa^{\kappa} = 2^{\kappa}$.

-

I guess that you know that $|\mathbb{N}| = |\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}|$ and thus $|\mathbb{R}| = |2^{\mathbb{N}}| = |2^{\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}}| = |2^\mathbb{N}\times 2^\mathbb{N}| = |\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}|$

This means that $|P(\mathbb{R})| = |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})|$. Since $f\colon\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is an element of $P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})$ you have that $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}$ (all the functions from $\mathbb{R}$ to itself) is of cardinality less or equal to the one of $P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})$ which in turn means that $|\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}|\le |P(\mathbb{R})|$.

Now, since $|P(\mathbb{R})| = |2^\mathbb{R}|$ which is the set of all functions from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\{0,1\}$, and clearly every function from $\mathbb{R}$ into $\{0,1\}$ is in particular a function from $\mathbb{R}$ into itself, we have: $$|P(\mathbb{R})| = |2^\mathbb{R}| \le |\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}| \le |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})| = |P(\mathbb{R})|$$

So all in all we have that $|\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}| = |P(\mathbb{R})| = |2^\mathbb{R}|$.

-
Did you mean $|P(\mathbb{R})|$ at the end of your second paragraph? – Arturo Magidin Jan 17 '11 at 23:51
@AsafKaraglia: Could you please detail how and why $|\mathbb{R}| = |\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}|$ and $\mathbb{R} \neq \mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}$ $\Longrightarrow |P(\mathbb{R})| = |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})|$? I made an incidental edits which I hope will help and referenced math.stackexchange.com/questions/29366/…. – Timere Nov 7 '13 at 1:10
@LePressentiment: Don't add color to my posts. Thank you. – Asaf Karagila Nov 7 '13 at 5:36
@AsafKaragila: No problem at all. I'll post my edition separately below. In your previous version (rollback) above, you write that $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}$ = all the functions from $\mathbb{R}$ to itself. Should this be the set of all such functions? Also, will you please to let me know of my previous comment, preceding your comment? – Timere Nov 7 '13 at 9:48
@LePressentiment: I don't know what you mean by that. $|A|=|B|$ implies that $|\mathcal P(A)|=|\mathcal P(B)|$. That's a simple exercise in the definition of cardinalities. And yes $A^B$ is the set of all functions from $B$ into $A$, although it is sometimes denoted by ${}^BA$. – Asaf Karagila Nov 7 '13 at 10:02

This is irrelevent here, still it is 'relevent'. The cardinality of set of all continuous function from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$ $(C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}))$ is $2 ^ \mathbb{N_0} = c$ because any such function is determined by its value on rationals. hence #$(C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}))$ = # $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q}$ which has cardinality $2^\mathbb{N_0}$.

-

This answer is based on, but differs slightly from, user Asaf Karaglia's above.

First, observe that by definition, $\{\text{all real functions of real variable}\}:= \{f: \; f: \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}\} := \mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}$.

The question is about $|\{\text{all real functions of real variable}\}|$, so examine an arbitrary real function of real variable: $f\,\colon\,\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}.$
By inspection, $f\,\colon\,\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} := \{(r, f(r)) : r \in \mathbb{R}\} \quad \subseteq \quad P(\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R})$.
Thus, $\color{green}{|\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}| \le |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})|}$.

Before continuing, let's try to simplify $|P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})|$. Observe that $|\mathbb{R}| = |\mathbb{R}^k| \, \forall \, k \in \mathbb{N}$. Its proof by mathematical induction requires the induction hypothesis of $|\mathbb{R}| = |\mathbb{R}^2|$, one proof of which is : $|\mathbb{N}| = |\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}| \implies |\mathbb{R}| = |2^{\mathbb{N}}| = |2^{\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}}| = |2^\mathbb{N}\times 2^\mathbb{N}| = |\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}|$.

Verily, $\mathbb{R} \neq \mathbb{R}^2$. Howbeit, for infinite sets $A,B$: $|A| = |B| \Longrightarrow \require{cancel} \cancel{\Longleftarrow} |P(A)| = |P(B)|$.
(The converse is discussed here.)

Thus, $|P(\mathbb{R})| = |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})| \implies \color{green}{|\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}| \le |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})|} = |P(\mathbb{R})|$. Now scrutinise $|P(\mathbb{R})|$:

● $\color{#A9057D}{|P(\mathbb{R})| = |2^{\mathbb{R}}|}$, where $2^{\mathbb{R}} := \{f : \; f: \mathbb{R} \to \{0,1\}\}$,
● Every $f: \mathbb{R} \to \{0,1\}$ is a particular case of a function from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$, thus $\color{#EC5021}{2^{\mathbb{R}} \subsetneq \mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}}$.

Altogether, $\color{#A9057D}{|P(\mathbb{R})| =} \color{#EC5021}{|2^\mathbb{R}| \le} \color{green}{|\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}| \le |P(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})|} = |P(\mathbb{R})|$

$\implies |P(\mathbb{R})| \qquad \qquad \quad \leq |\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}| \leq |P(\mathbb{R})| \implies \color{#A9057D}{\underbrace{|P(\mathbb{R})|}_{= |2^\mathbb{R}|}} = |\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}|$.

-
Downvoters, pursuant to my edit, please let me know of further sugggestions which would be more instructive than a mere downvote. – Timere Nov 8 '13 at 7:35
Use less colors, so people with disabilities could read this without getting a headache. – Asaf Karagila Nov 8 '13 at 8:31