Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We can see intuitively that $$ f(x)=\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\cdots\sin{x}\cdots\right)\right)\right) $$ is the square wave with period $2\pi$ and has the value $0$ at the jumps, i.e $$ f(x)= \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } \frac{x}{\pi}\in\mathbb{Z}\\ \mathrm{sign}(\sin{x}) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$ Look at this graph of $x$ and $\sin{\frac{\pi}{2}x}$ to see why :

Graph of x and sin(pi/2*x)

But $f(x)$ is then also exactly equal to the Fourier series of the square wave with period $2\pi$ since Dirichlet conditions assure that the series converges to $0$ (the midpoint) at the jumps as do $f(x)$.

Hence we might be able to show that, $$ \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\cdots\sin{x}\cdots\right)\right)\right)=\frac{4}{\pi}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\sin{(2k+1)x}}{2k+1} $$

Does anyone have an idea of how to prove this directly? Are there other Fourier series that are equal to a recursive formula of trigonometric functions?

Restated, the problem is to show that if $$ f_0(x)=\sin{x},\quad\text{and}\quad f_n(x)=\sin{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}f_{n-1}(x)\right)} $$ then, $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}{f_n(x)}=\frac{4}{\pi}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\sin{(2k+1)x}}{2k+1} $$

share|cite|improve this question
Perhaps you should elaborate on the meaning of "directly". This seems pretty direct to me, and I'm having a hard time imagining how it might be shown even more directly. – joriki Aug 4 '12 at 18:58
Thanks @J.M.. Unfortunately, my current lack of knowledge of the German language makes it hard for me to extract useful information. Do they investigate this kind of question in the paper? – M. M. Aug 4 '12 at 20:18
I like the "current" in "current lack of knowledge" :-) "Über die Iteration der ganzen transzendenten Funktionen, insbesondere von $\sin z$ und $\cos z$" means "On the iteration of the entire transcendental functions, in particular of $\sin z$ and $\cos z$" -- but you may have guessed as much already. I don't have free access to the rest of the paper. – joriki Aug 4 '12 at 21:48
The paper seems to be concerned mainly with properties of the set of points you get when iterating. As far as I can tell, the results are not of use for the question here. – Gregor Bruns Aug 5 '12 at 0:16
@joriki: late but... J.M.'s (well Töpfer's) paper at gdz – Raymond Manzoni Aug 28 '12 at 12:07

I don't think you can easily compute $\mathcal F{\left( f \circ f \right)}$ from $\mathcal F{(f)}$, where $\mathcal F$ is the Fourier transform.

But you can prove the statement above ($f^n$ means $f \circ \cdots \circ f$, $n$-times):

$$ \lim_{n \to +\infty} f^n(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } \frac{x}{\pi}\in\mathbb{Z}\\ \mathrm{sign}(\sin{x}) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$

And then deduce:

$$ \lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)}=\frac{4}{\pi}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\sin{(2k+1)x}}{2k+1} $$ $f(x) = \sin( \frac{\pi}{2} x) $ sends $[-1,1]$ onto itself, it has $3$ fixed points: $-1, 0$ and $1$.

The derivative at these points is respectively: $0, \frac{\pi}{2} > 1$ and $0$. So $-1$ and $1$ are super-attracting fixed points (any point close to $-1$ or $1$ move closer and closer) whereas $0$ is repelling fixed point (any point close to $0$ move away).

If $0 < x < 1$, $f^n(x) \to 1$ (very fast) and if $-1 < x < 0$, $f^n(x) \to -1$.

I can give more details, if needed.

share|cite|improve this answer

$$f(x)=\underbrace{\sin\bigg(\frac\pi2f(x)\bigg)}_{\Large\in[-1,1]}\iff\frac{\sin g(x)}{g(x)}=\frac2\pi,\quad\text{where }g(x)=\frac\pi2f(x)$$ But it is clear from the graphic of the sinc function that this only happens when the argument is $\dfrac\pi2$ implying $f(x)=1$. So all that's left is showing that $\displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{\sin(2k+1)x}{2k+1}\equiv\frac\pi4$ , for all $x\not\in\mathbb Z[\pi]$, which is indeed a truthful statement.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.