Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In linear programming where we seek to minimize $c^Tx \to \text{min}_{x\in P}!$ with respect to some inequality constraints, why do we choose $P$ in the form

$Ax \leq b$, $x \geq 0$

as the standard form of a linear program? In the geometrical view $\{x: Ax \leq b\}$ seems much more natural, why don't we use this, or a type II-inequality constraint? (I am aware that we can transform the inequalities, but this does not always preserve the dimension of the problem, and gives an overhead to the proofs)

share|cite|improve this question
Exactly who "chooses $P$ in the form $Ax\le b,x\ge 0$"? I for one always use the standard form $\min c^T x: Ax=b, x\ge 0$ as this is the formulation on which I can show the procession of the simplex method to my students most naturally. By the way, I think what you refer to is the canonical form. – Gabor Retvari Aug 10 '12 at 19:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.