Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a vector valued function $U(x,y)=\Big(u_{1}(x,y),u_{2}(x,y)\Big)$. I want to find $\|\nabla U\|_{L_{2}(0,1)}$, but i could not figure how can do it. Do you have any idea?

share|cite|improve this question
Do you mean divergence of $U$? I don't know how you take the gradient of a vector-valued function. – arzela Aug 4 '12 at 12:48
as i know gradient(U(x,y))=jacobi($u_{1},u_{2}$) – Brhn Aug 4 '12 at 12:50
@Brhn What is the context of the problem? Is there any more information you can provide? – Jayesh Badwaik Aug 4 '12 at 16:39

It is unusual to denote the derivative of a vector valued function $(u_1, u_2)$ by gradient, but if one does there is not much choice -- it will involve the gradient of both $u_1, u_2$ in some way.

One possible and, I guess, reasonable, defintion would be $\nabla U:= (\nabla u_1, \nabla u_2)$, which is matrix of course. One possible defintion of norm would then be $|\nabla u_1|+ |\nabla u_2|$, but for the definion of an $L_2$ - norm $(|\nabla u_1|^2+ |\nabla u_2|^2)^{1/2}$ looks more natural to me, with $|\nabla u_i| = \left[\sum_k \left( \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x^k}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}$ as norm of choice for each $i$.

The $L_2$ - norm of this would then be defined as $$ \int_\Omega (|\nabla u_1|^2+ |\nabla u_2|^2)^{1/2} dx^1d x^2 $$

Note that it does not make sense to define an $L_2((0,1))$-norm for a function of two variables, the domain of definition should allow for two variables.

share|cite|improve this answer
I know your answer is assuming things due to lack of information from the OP, but as I guess the the "gradient" is basically a jacobian matrix between the two sets of variables and hence its norm must be the Frobenius norm or a spectral norm of a matrix. I am not sure though. – Jayesh Badwaik Aug 4 '12 at 16:39
@JayeshBadwaik $(\nabla u_1, \nabla u_2)$ is, basically, the jacobian. – user20266 Aug 4 '12 at 16:59
Yeah I meant that too, I was talking about its norm. – Jayesh Badwaik Aug 4 '12 at 17:15
@JayeshBadwaik for an $L^2$ norm one would expect the root of the integral with the sum of all squared derivatives $\partial u_k/\partial x^j$ as the integrand. This is exactly what you get with the formula I suggested. – user20266 Aug 4 '12 at 17:23
@JayeshBadwaik (if you write it down in components you actually do get the Frobenius norm) – user20266 Aug 4 '12 at 17:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.