Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For some reason, I'm having trouble visualizing how to put a CW structure on a disk with 2 smaller disks removed. What I'd like to do is have three 0-cells, five 1-cells, and a single 2-cell. Three of the one cells would be glued to the three vertices to give three disjoint circles, and the other two 1-cells would be used to connect the three circles together. Then I can't see how to glue the 2-cell in, because when I visualize it, it always ends up covering one of the holes in the disk.

I realize my ability to visualize CW-complexes is not so good. For another example, it seems to me that if you take a wedge of two circles A and B, and glue a 2-cell on by $AB$, you should get a wedge of two disks, which would be contractible. But using cellular homology I see this has a nontrivial first homology group. I'd appreciate help sorting these two examples out to aid my intuition.

share|improve this question
    
A disk with 2 smaller disks removed has nontrivial first homology group $H_1(S)=\Bbb{Z}\oplus\Bbb{Z}$, being homotopy equivalent to the wedge of two circles, no? –  Managu Aug 3 '12 at 1:25
    
Sure. The problem really is to put a CW structure on this, not to calculate anything. –  John Aug 3 '12 at 1:27

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Your thoughts on how to arrange the 0- and 1-cells are spot on. If you can draw the structure with just the 0- and 1-cells, you should see a good place to put the 2-cell. If you get stuck, I've drawn a picture:

http://imgur.com/P4Bc6

For the second example, recall that you're not actually filling in either of $A$ or $B$. Attaching a 2-cell via $AB$ means creating something like what you get when you pinch one of these:

http://imgur.com/QcZfi

by holding a point on the top and bottom rings in your fist. Alternately, you can picture a piece of macaroni noodle with the smaller arc connecting the ends shrunk to a point. In fact, such a space is homotopy equivalent to a cylinder- simply unscrunch the join point of the circles into an interval. If you're curious about this sort of thing, some treatment is given in chapter 0 of Hatcher.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, this was exactly what I had thought, but for some reason didn't think it worked. –  John Aug 3 '12 at 1:46

Please allow me to present my terrible GIMP sketch:

enter image description here

So we have points p1, p2, and p3, lines L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5, and I didn't label the obvious 2-cell. If I were to describe the attaching map of the 2-cell, I might start at p1, attach along L4, attach along L1, attach along -L4, attach along L5, attach along L2, attach along -L5, and attach along -L3 (ending at p1 again). I use +- to indicate direction, using the arrows on my rough sketch as the guide.

And as we can see - the fundamental group is very clearly nontrivial.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.