Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have come across the following example of a non-separable Hilbert space:

Example 2.84. Let $I$ be a set, equipped with the discrete topology and the counting measure $\lambda_{\text{ count}}$ defined on the $\sigma$-algebra $\Bbb P(I)$ of all subsets of $I$. Then $$\ell^2(I)=L^2\big(I,\Bbb P(I),\lambda_{\text{ count}}\big)$$ is a Hilbert space, and it comprises all functions $a:I\to\Bbb R$ (or $\Bbb C$) for which the support $$F=\{i\in I : a(i)\ne0\},$$ is finite or countable, and for which $\sum_{i\in I}|a_i|^2=\sum_{i\in F}|a_i|^2\lt\infty$.

Why do I need the discrete topology on $I$? Or more generally: why do I need a topology? If we talk about $L^p$ spaces in general, we only want a measure space and we don't mention a topology because $f \in L^p$ doesn't have to be continuous. Thanks for your help.

share|improve this question
We do not need any topology here –  userNaN Aug 2 '12 at 16:19
You are welcome! –  userNaN Aug 2 '12 at 16:21
Maybe topology is useful in an other part of the example (if the whole example is displayed, I don't see). A remark: the Hilbert space we define in such a way can be separable (when $I$ is finite or countable), otherwise it isn't. –  Davide Giraudo Aug 2 '12 at 16:22
Maybe earlier examples were about $L^p$-spaces with respect to Radon measures on locally compact spaces? The discrete topology is locally compact and $\mathbb P(I)$ is the Borel $\sigma$-algebra, etc. hence compactly supported (=finitely supported) functions are dense. –  t.b. Aug 2 '12 at 16:27
I don't see a typo here. It is in the mindset of many people to equip a set with the discrete topology by reflex when it has none and to say that explicitly. That's why you find "Let $G$ be a discrete group" all over the place even when there's no topological group whatsoever in sight. –  t.b. Aug 2 '12 at 17:28

3 Answers 3

To summarize the comments in an answer:

You are correct, the topology on $I$ is irrelevant and was probably mentioned by mistake.

(If someone will upvote this answer, the question will stop being bumped.)

share|improve this answer

In fact, "discrete topology on $I$ = $\sigma$-algebra of $\mathbb{P}(I)$ of all subsets of $I$".

share|improve this answer

The reason why a discrete topology is required for $I$, is to make sure that the $\sigma$-algebra of the Borel sets is the whole power set of $I$, i.e. ${\mathscr P}(I)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.