Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A variation of arbitrary complex measure $\nu$ on the measurable set $E$ is called the number $\|\nu\|(E)=\sup \sum_{n=1}^\infty |\nu (E_n)|$, where supremum is taken over all sequences $(E_n)$ such that $E_n$ are measurable, pairwise disjoint and their union is $E$.

Let $\mu$ and $\lambda$ be a complex measures on the same sigma-algebra in $X$ and assume that these measures are concentrate in disjoint measurable subsets $A,B \subset X$.

I wish to show that then $\| \lambda+\mu \| (E)=\|\lambda\|(E)+\|\mu\|(E)$ for arbitrary measurable set $E$.

I know how to do "$\leq$ "inequality but don't know how to prove "$\geq$".

Thanks

share|improve this question
    
Do you know about the Hahn decomposition? –  Nate Eldredge Aug 1 '12 at 18:26
    
Yes, I know (for real measures). –  Richard Aug 1 '12 at 18:37

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Fix $\varepsilon>0$, and $\{E_j\},\{F_j\}$ sequences of pairwise disjoint measurable sets such that $$\lVert\mu\rVert(E)\leq \sum_{j=0}^{+\infty}|\mu(E_j)|+\varepsilon,\quad \lVert\nu\rVert(E)\leq \sum_{j=0}^{+\infty}|\nu(F_j)|+\varepsilon.$$ Define for $(i,j,k)\in\Bbb N^2\times \{0,1\}$: $$S_{i,j,0}=E_i\cap F_j\cap A,\quad S_{i,j,1}=E_i\cap F_j\cap B.$$ This gives pairwise disjoint sets. Using $\sigma$-additivity and the property of concentration, we get \begin{align} \lVert \mu+\nu\rVert(E)&\geq \sum_{(i,j,k)\in \Bbb N^2\times \{0,1\}}|(\mu+\nu)(S_{i,j,k})|\\ &=\sum_{(i,j)\in\Bbb N}|\mu(E_i\cap F_j)|+\sum_{(i,j)\in\Bbb N}|\nu(E_i\cap F_j)|\\ &=\sum_{i\in\Bbb N}\sum_{j\in\Bbb N}|\mu(E_i\cap F_j)|+\sum_{j\in\Bbb N}\sum_{i\in\Bbb N}|\nu(E_i\cap F_j)|\\ &\geq \sum_{i\in\Bbb N}\left|\sum_{j\in\Bbb N}\mu(E_i\cap F_j)\right|+ \sum_{j\in\Bbb N}\left|\sum_{i\in\Bbb N}\nu(E_i\cap F_j)\right|\\ &=\sum_{i\in\Bbb N}|\mu(E_i)|+\sum_{j\in\Bbb N}|\nu(F_j)|\\ &\geq \lVert\mu\rVert(E)+\lVert\nu\rVert(E)-2\varepsilon. \end{align} This gives the result since $\varepsilon$ is arbitrary.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.