Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am beginning to study multidimensional calculus using Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds, and so far I understand the purpose of considering the classes $C^n$ to be twofold. First, being in $C^n$ is a handy sufficient condition for the equality of mixed partials of degree $n$. Second, being in $C^1$ is a handy sufficient condition for the existence of the total derivative. I have two questions. (1) What are some other important reasons to be interested in the classes $C^n$? Is being in one of these classes necessary for anything or just always a handy sufficient condition? (2) How can the classes $C^n$ be defined in a coordinate-free way? The Wikipedia article on smooth functions claims that a coordinate-free definition is possible and that this can be seen by using a Banach space approach. I think I sort of understand what a Fréchet derivative, but I still do not understand this coordinate-free approach and how it is equivalent to the standard approach. It is not really explained in Wikipedia.

share|cite|improve this question
Your question is not really a duplicate, but see this related one. – user31373 Aug 1 '12 at 16:25
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The spaces $C^n$ – assuming its elements take on values in a vector space – are (infinite-dimensional) vector spaces themselves with a lot of structure (they admit a complete norm, making the spaces Banach spaces if you are a bit careful when choosing the domain and boundary behaviour). They and a zoo of additional spaces are a basis for several approaches to prove existence results for (ordinary and partial) differential equations. For partial differential equations they are not that useful but form a basis for other, more suitable spaces (spaces with Hölder continuous derivatives). Also for other spaces (Sobolev spaces) which are useful in PDE existence theory one has inclusion results into $C^n$ and can prove using differentialbility of abstract existence results using this (quite advanced) fact.

Interestingly, in differential geometry they are often not considered, but only $C^\infty$ is used.

A coordinate free way of saying that $f$ is of class $C^1(U, \mathbb{R})$ is by saying that there exists a continuous linear map $df:U\rightarrow L(\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R})$ (the space of linear functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$, which is just its dual space) such that $df$ approximates $f$ in the following sense: $$\lim_{x\rightarrow y}\frac{f(x)-f(y)-df(y)(x-y)}{||x-y||} = 0$$ This reduces to the coordinate-based definition easily by introducing a coordinate system around $y$ and then checking that, e.g., $$ \frac{\partial f(y)}{\partial x_i} = df(y) e_i\;,$$ $e_i$ being the $i$-th standard basis vector, dual to the linear map $x^i$ which maps $v=\sum v^i e_i$ to $x^i(v)=v^i$. To get a feeling for this definition you need to work with it for a while. Higher-order coordinate-free definitions are then given recursively, i.e. $f\in C^2(U)$ iff $df \in C^1$. Writing down the target space soon becomes a bit clumsy, though.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.