Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that the Legendre transform $F(p)$ of a given function $f(q)$ is well defined only if $f(q)$ has a definite convexity. Furthermore I know that I can take the Legendre transform twice to recover the original function $f(q)$.

So my guess is that also $F(p)$ should have a definite convexity (because I can take the Legendre transform twice), anyone can tell me if is it true or not?

If this is true, the convexity of $F(p)$ is the same of $f(q)$ or not? (The Legendre transform of a convex function is still convex or is concave or can be either convex or concave?)

Thanks ;)

share|cite|improve this question

If $f$ is convex and $F$ is its Legendre transform then $f(q)+F(p)\ge qp$, with equality in the case when $p$ and $q$ correspond to each other (i.e., $p=\nabla f(q)$, $q=\nabla F(p)$). This shows that the graph of $F$ lies above the tangent plane at any point, so that $F$ is indeed convex.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.