Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $A$ be a commutative noetherian ring, and suppose that $A$ is $I$-adically complete with respect to some ideal $I\subseteq A$. Is it true that for any ideal $J\subseteq I$, the ring $A$ is also $J$-adically complete?

Edit. Recall that a ring $A$ is $I$-adically complete if the canonical morphism $A\to \varprojlim A/I^n$ is an isomorphism.

share|improve this question
    
Can you expand on the definition of $I$-adically complete? I'm not sure if $\bigcap_nI^n=0$ is necessary, which would make a difference to the counterexample, if any. –  George Lowther Jan 16 '11 at 14:41
    
@George: Dear George, Usually $I$-adically complete is taken to mean "complete and separated", i.e. that the intersection you ask about does equal $0$. –  Matt E Jan 16 '11 at 15:24
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The answer is "yes".

Since $A$ is Noetherian, for any $m$ the finitely generated $A$-module $A/J^m$ is $I$-adically complete, and so $A/J^m$ is the inverse limit over $n$ of $A/(I^n + J^m)$. Now $J^m \subset I^m,$ and so $I^n \subset I^n + J^m \subset I^m$ when $n \geq m$. Thus the inverse limit (over $m$) of $A/J^m$ is the same as the inverse limit (over $n$) of $A/I^n$, and we see that $A$ is $J$-adically complete.

Another way to think about it is that $A$ is $I$-adically complete (and separated, which is part of the requirement of "complete") if and only if any $I$-adic Cauchy sequence of elements of $A$ has a unique $I$-adic limit. Since a $J$-adic Cauchy sequence is also an $I$-adic sequence, a $J$-adic Cauchy $(a_n)$ sequence also has a unique $I$-adic limit, say $a$.

Now if we choose $n_0$ so that $a_m - a_n \in J^k$ if $m,n \geq n_0$, then we see that $a - a_m = a - a_{n} + a_{n} - a_m \in J^k + I^l,$ where $l$ can be made arbitrarily large by choosing $n$ large enough (since $a_n$ converges to $a$ in the $I$-adic topology). Thus $a - a_m \in \cap_l J^k + I^l.$ This intersection is equal to $J^k$ (by $I$-adic completeness of $A/J^k$) and so $a-a_m \in J^k$. Thus in fact $(a_n)$ converges to $a$ in the $J$-adic topology, and so $A$ is $J$-adically complete.

share|improve this answer
    
Matt: can you expand on that? –  George Lowther Jan 16 '11 at 15:34
    
@Matt: The bit I found tricky when thinking about this is showing that $A/J^m$ is $I$-adically complete. Why is that? Does it follow from being finitely generated? –  George Lowther Jan 16 '11 at 17:24
    
Actually, it does not follow. I have a counterexample in mind. –  George Lowther Jan 16 '11 at 17:38
    
I'm not sure that the ring in my counterexample is noetherian. Do you have a reference or proof that $A/J^m$ is $I$-adically complete? –  George Lowther Jan 16 '11 at 18:01
    
@George: Dear George, The Artin--Rees lemma implies that any f.g. module of an $I$-adically complete Noetherian ring is itself $I$-adically complete. Regards, –  Matt E Jan 16 '11 at 19:21
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.