Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking for a intuitive proof of Tucker's lemma and/or the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. The proof should not make use of topology, cohomology etc. as it should be understandable by undergraduates.

Thanks in advance!

share|cite|improve this question
This proof of Borsuk-Ulam seems to be elementary, I'm not sure it is intuitive (I haven't checked it in detail). – Michael Greinecker Jul 29 '12 at 19:28
Thanks a lot for you help! – user36773 Jul 29 '12 at 21:23

This is my intuition for the special case of $n=2$ (it cannot be easilly generalized to higher dimensions). If $f: S^2\to \mathbb{R}^2$ is antipodal and nowhere zero, than $g:=f/|f|$ is an antipodal map from $S^2$ to the circle $S^1$. Take two antipodal points in the equator, $A$ and $B$. Their images $f(A)$ and $f(B)$ are antipodal on the circle and the image of the half-circle $AB$ on the equator is mapped to some curve on the circle that winds around the circle $n+1/2$ times for some $n$. So, the image of the whole equator ($(AB)$+the antipodal halfcircle $(BA)$) winds around the circle $2n+1$ times, a nonzero number. The equator can be slipped towards the north pole and contracted in $S^2$. However, for its image, you cannot contract a curve in the circle that has a nontrivial winding number.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.