How do I get insight into equations with the $\sum$ notation without actually expanding it for a specific n every time?

I am reading Goldstein's Classical Mechanics and I've noticed there is copious use of the $\sum$ notation. He even writes the chain rule as a sum! I am having a real hard time following his arguments where this notation is used, often with differentiation and multiple indices thrown in for good measure. How do I get some working insight into how sums behave without actually saying "Now imagine n=2. What does the sum become in this case?" Is there an easier way to do this? Is there an "algebra" or "calculus" of sums, like a set of rules for manipulating them? I've seen some documents on the web but none of them seem to come close to Goldstein's usage in terms of sophistication. Where can I get my hands on practice material for this notation?

-

migrated from physics.stackexchange.comJul 27 '12 at 4:33

This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

...eliminate the $\Sigma$s using the Einstein summation convention ;). – E.P. Jul 26 '12 at 15:15
It would be helpful, if you actually gave a reference to what book you read. Goldstein might be sufficient for some people, but not all. – orbifold Jul 26 '12 at 21:04
@Joebevo You should find at least one physics subfield tag in addition to "soft-question" and attach it to your question (BTW What is the Goldstein you are reading ?) or dmckee will come and close this ... :-/ – Dilaton Jul 26 '12 at 22:35
Post edited to reflect suggestions. – Joebevo Jul 27 '12 at 2:57
@Dilaton that doesn't make it on topic here, though. Not anything of interest to physicists is on topic for this site. I'm going to send it to math. – David Z Jul 27 '12 at 4:33

Donald Knuth's book "The Art of Computer Programming" Volume 1 contains probably all the tricks of manipulating sums, you will ever need. If you just want to learn the material in Goldstein and find it hard, you should consider an alternative book with the same material.

-

Just look at the formulas in the various derivations, abstract from them the operations that apparently have been going on to reaching the rhs from the lhs, keep a list of these rules, and take the recurring ones as permissions to do this sort of rearrangement or substitution.

If a text isn't too short of intermediate steps and doesn't have too many misprints, this reveals the hidden secrets in most calculations, not only sums.

-

I remember that I completely lost my uneasines with sums after reading first several chapters of this book. Apart from being very educative, having lots of various excercises, and $\sum$ letter on its cover -- it is also very fun to read.

-