Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can somebody tell me what's wrong with the following argument?

If $f$ is $L^1$ Lebesgue-integrable, say $f$ positive, then it is bounded almost everywhere by some bound $M$. Then $f^2 < M\cdot f$ which is in $L^1$, then $f$ is in $L^2$ and $L^1$ lies in $L^2$. It seems to me that the map $x^{-1/2}$ is $L^1$ but not $L^2$ on $(0,1)$, hence a counterexample...

So I'm a bit confused.

share|improve this question
6  
Integrable functions may not be almost everywhere bounded. – Did Jul 26 '12 at 9:48
@superM: no, it's not. – Martin Argerami Jul 28 '12 at 22:25

2 Answers

Your argument shows that if $f\in L^1$ and it is bounded a.e., then it is in $L^2$. But, as your own example shows, not every function in $L^1$ is bounded.

share|improve this answer

$f \in L^2(a,b) \Rightarrow f \in L^1(a,b)$, but the converse is false! you just gave a counterexample.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.