Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is the following proposition true? If yes, how would you prove this?

Proposition Let $k$ be an algebraic number field. Let $K$ be a finite abelian extension of $k$. Suppose every principal prime ideal of $k$ splits completely in $K$. Let $L$ be a finite extension of $k$. Let $E = KL$. Let $\mathfrak{P}$ be a prime ideal of $L$ such that the relative degree of $\mathfrak{P}$ in $L/k$ is 1 and $N_{L/k}(\mathfrak{P})$ is principal. Then $\mathfrak{P}$ splits completely in $E$.


Let $\mathcal{I}$ be the group of fractional ideals of $L$. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be the group of principal ideals of $L$. Let $\mathcal{H}$ = {$I \in \mathcal{I}$; $N_{L/k}(I)$ is principal}. Then $\mathcal{H}$ is a subgroup of $\mathcal{I}$ such that $\mathcal{I} \supset \mathcal{H} \supset \mathcal{P}$. If the proposition is true, it satisfies the assumption of this proposition.


Let $N_{L/k}(\mathfrak{P}) = \mathfrak{p}$. Let $M = K \cap L$. Let $N_{L/M}(\mathfrak{P}) = \mathfrak{p}_M$. Then $\mathfrak{p}_M$ splits completely in $K$. Let $\mathfrak{p}_M = \mathfrak{Q_1}\cdots\mathfrak{Q_m}$, where $m = [K : M]$. Let $\mathfrak{Q_i'}$ be the ideal in $E$ generated by $\mathfrak{P}$ and $\mathfrak{Q_i}$. Then perhaps we can prove that $\mathfrak{P} = \mathfrak{Q_1'}\cdots\mathfrak{Q_m'}$ and $\mathfrak{Q_i'}$s are distinct primes. Hence $\mathfrak{P}$ splits completely in $E$.

share|cite|improve this question
Please let me know the reason for the downvotes. Unless you make it clear, it is hard to improve my question. – Makoto Kato Jul 28 '12 at 6:46

The assumption on $K$ is equivalent to $K$ being contained in the Hilbert class field $H$ of $k$. Thus $E$ is contained in the Hilbert class field of $L$. Thus $Gal(K/k)$ is naturally a quotient of $C_k$ (the class group of $k$), while $Gal(E/L)$ is naturally a quotient of $C_L$ (the class group of $L$).

There is an embedding $Gal(E/L) \hookrightarrow Gal(K/k)$ (given by restriction to $K$), which in terms of (quotients of) ideal class groups is induced by the norm.

Now $\mathfrak P$ splits completely in $E$ if and only if its associated Frobenius element is trivial. This can be tested by restricting to $k$ (since this restriction map is injective, as noted above).

Now $Frob_{\mathfrak P}$ corresponds precisely to the image of $\mathfrak B$ in (the relevant quotient of) $C_L$. Restricting to $k$ is given by applying the norm map, and by assumption $N_{L/k}(\mathfrak P)$ is trivial in $C_k$. Thus the restriction of $Frob_{\mathfrak P}$ is trivial, and so $Frob_{\mathfrak P}$ is trivial itself.

(Unless I'm blundering, the assumption that $\mathfrak P$ be of relative degree $1$ over $k$ is not needed.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.