Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I don't understand this step on this article. $$A'(x)u_1(x) + B'(x)u_2(x) = 0$$ why we desire A=A(x) and B=B(x) to be of this form? What is the basis that this form is valid?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
    
So you ask "why". Well, just because it is useful. Have you read the entire article? Just go on, you will see what I mean and you will note how that condition is extremely useful. –  Romeo Jul 25 '12 at 21:15
2  
Yes i read the entire article for second order ...the whole problems is solved based on this. but why this condition holds? –  Santosh Linkha Jul 25 '12 at 21:22
    
Well, the condition does not "hold". You simply require that A(x) and B(x) satisfy that condition. Seems incredible but it works and it simplifies next calculations; and, of course, it allows you to solve the algebraic system. Hope this helps –  Romeo Jul 25 '12 at 21:26

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

This is closely tied to the method of osculating parameters. Suppose we wish to represent, with constant coefficients, some arbitrary function $u(x)$ with two linearly independent functions $u_1(x)$ and $u_2(x)$, $$u(x) = A u_1(x) + B u_2(x).$$ In general this can not be done. The best we can do is match the value of the function and its derivative at some point $x_0$, $$\begin{eqnarray*} u(x_0) &=& A u_1(x_0) + B u_2(x_0) \\ u'(x_0) &=& A u_1'(x_0) + B u_2'(x_0). \end{eqnarray*}$$ The conditions above determine the osculating parameters, the constants $A$ and $B$. $A$ and $B$ will be different depending on the point $x_0$. In general this fit will be poor at points far from $x_0$.

The method of variation of parameters involves finding the osculating parameters $A$ and $B$ at every point. That is, we let $A$ and $B$ be functions of $x$. The condition that they are the osculating parameters is that they satisfy $$\begin{eqnarray*} u_G(x) &=& A(x) u_1(x) + B(x) u_2(x) \\ u_G'(x) &=& A(x) u_1'(x) + B(x) u_2'(x), \end{eqnarray*}$$ just as above. For the second equation to hold it must be the case that $$A'(x)u_1(x) + B'(x)u_2(x) = 0.$$

share|improve this answer

I suggest you to read this page. In particular

Here’s the assumption. Simply to make the first derivative easier to deal with we are going to assume that whatever $u_1(t)$ and $u_2(t)$ are they will satisfy the following [...]

Now, there is no reason ahead of time to believe that this can be done. However, we will see that this will work out. We simply make this assumption on the hope that it won’t cause problems down the road and to make the first derivative easier so don’t get excited about it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.