Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Could any one tell me with an example, what is the relation between Order and Multiplicity of a holomorphic function on Riemann Surface,and how this formuale comes?

for example let $p\in X$ be not a pole for $f$, and $f(p)=z_0$ then $f(z)-z_o$ has a simple zero at $p$ so $mult_p(f-f(p))=1$,$ord_p(f-f(p))=ord_p(f)-ord_p(f(p))=1+0?$

share|cite|improve this question
The formula $ord_p(f-g)=ord_p(f)-ord_p(g)$ that you seem to use is false – Georges Elencwajg Jul 25 '12 at 18:44

Let me just quote Rick Miranda's "Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces":

(Chapter II) Lemma 4.7: Let $f$ be a meromorphic function on a Riemann surface $X$, with associated holomorphic map $F\colon X \to \widehat{\mathbb{C}}$.

a) If $p \in X$ is a zero of $f$, then $\text{mult}_p(F) = \text{ord}_p(f)$.

b) If $p \in X$ is a pole of $f$, then $\text{mult}_p(F) = -\text{ord}_p(f)$.

c) If $p \in X$ neither a zero nor a pole of $f$, then $\text{mult}_p(F) = \text{ord}_p(f - f(p))$.

I don't have time right now, but perhaps later I'll include a proof and an example.

share|cite|improve this answer
I find Miranda's trichotomy artificial: if $p$ is not a pole of $f$, then $\text{mult}_p(F) = \text{ord}_p(f - f(p))$, period. There is no need to artificially distinguish the cases $f(p)=0$ and $f(p)\neq 0$. In other words, I find it clearer to say that you have the dichotomy: either b) or else a)+c). But of course this is a matter of taste and Miranda's book is excellent anyway, so +1 for your mentioning it. – Georges Elencwajg Jul 25 '12 at 19:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.