Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can you tell me what's wrong with my proof? Thanks.

Claim: If $R$ is a Noetherian ring and $I$ is an irreducible ideal in $R$ then $I$ is prime

Proof: Let $xy \in I$. We want to show that either $x\in I$ or $y \in I$. By contradiction assume neither $x\in I$ nor $y \in I$. Then $I + \langle x \rangle$ and $I + \langle y \rangle$ are two ideals properly containing $I$ and $I + \langle x \rangle \cap I + \langle y \rangle = I + \langle xy \rangle = I$, i.e. $I$ is reducible which is a contradiction to our assumption.

share|cite|improve this question
Wish I could delete this question : / – Rudy the Reindeer Jul 23 '12 at 14:00
up vote 4 down vote accepted

How do you know that: $$I + \langle x \rangle \cap I + \langle y \rangle = I + \langle xy \rangle$$? That seems like a big leap, especially since it is not true in general that $\langle x\rangle\cap\langle y\rangle = \langle xy \rangle$ (which is the case $I=\{0\}$.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Doh. It's not even true in $\mathbb Z$: $\langle 10 \rangle \cap \langle 5 \rangle = \langle \mathrm{lcm}(5, 10)\rangle = \langle 10 \rangle$. Thanks. – Rudy the Reindeer Jul 23 '12 at 13:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.