Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a comprehension problem regarding Fourier transforms. So far I know, the Fourier transform can be defined on the whole Schwartz space $\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R})$ and is bijective on it. So I have a function $u(x) \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R})$ and want to Fourier transform $u(x)\partial_x u(x)$ according to the prescription $\partial_x \rightarrow ik$. This gives:

$$u(x)\frac{\partial u(x)}{\partial x} \rightarrow \widehat{u}*(ik\widehat{u}) = i \intop_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\widehat{u}(p)(k-p)\widehat{u}(k-p)dp = \intop_{-\infty}^{+\infty}p\widehat{u}(p)\widehat{u}(k-p)dp.$$

But on the other hand it is also true that

$$u(x)\frac{\partial u(x)}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(u^2(x)) \rightarrow \frac{1}{2}ik\widehat{u^2} = \frac{1}{2}ik\intop_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\widehat{u}(p)\widehat{u}(k-p)dp.$$

The two integrals in Fourier space on the very right should be the same but I cannot see how. For this one should show that

$$\intop_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\widehat{u}(p)\widehat{u}(k-p)dp = \frac{2}{k}\intop_{-\infty}^{+\infty}p\widehat{u}(p)\widehat{u}(k-p)dp.$$ Does anyone have an idea how to do that?

share|cite|improve this question

Call $I(k)$ the integral of the RHS. Using the substitution $t=k-p$, we get that $$I(k)=k\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\widehat u(p)\widehat u(k-p)dp-I(k),$$ hence $$2I(k)=k\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\widehat u(p)\widehat u(k-p)dp,$$ which is the wanted formula.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.