Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is from Berkeley Problems in Mathematics, Spring 86. It asks for $\lambda\in \mathbb{R}$, find all solutions of the following two equations:

$$\phi(x)=e^{x}+\lambda\int^{x}_{0}e^{x-y}\phi(y)dy; \psi(x)=e^{x}+\lambda\int^{1}_{0}e^{x-y}\psi(y)dy$$

My thought is to take the derivative, thus we have $\frac{d}{dx}\phi=e^{x}+\lambda\phi(x)$ because we have $$\frac{d}{dx}\lambda \int^{x}_{0}e^{x}/e^{y}\phi(y)dy=\lambda e^{x}/e^{x}\phi(x)=\lambda \phi(x)$$. And so is the equation for $\psi$ Thus the difference equation would be $$\frac{d}{dx}(\phi-\psi)=\lambda(\phi-\psi)$$ and implies $\phi-\psi=Ce^{\lambda x}$ for some $C$. But I do not know how to use this to solve the original equation. The seeming simple equation $$\frac{d}{dx}\phi=e^{x}+\lambda\phi(x)$$is also not easy to solve. I do not know how to treat the delay term $e^{x}$ or find a special solution for this.

share|improve this question
    
Double-check your first derivative; it is incorrect. Also, is there a typo in the question? The two equations seem to be identical copies, making the problem very uninteresting. –  Erick Wong Jul 22 '12 at 7:22
    
There is typo as you can check here:math.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/pages/Spring86.pdf But my derivative may be wrong as you said. –  Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 7:25
    
I double checked, and see no problem with the derivative. Yes it is an uninteresting problem to me... –  Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 7:34
    
The upper limit on the integral with the $\psi$ equation should be $1$, not $x$. –  copper.hat Jul 22 '12 at 7:59
2  
I get the differential equation $\phi' = (1+\lambda) \phi$. You differentiated incorrectly, the upper limit of integration is $x$, not a constant. –  copper.hat Jul 22 '12 at 8:03
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The derivative of $\phi(x)=e^{x}+\lambda\int^{x}_{0}e^{x-y}\phi(y) \,dy$ is $\phi'(x) = e^{x}+\lambda \phi(x) + \lambda\int^{x}_{0}e^{x-y}\phi(y)\, dy$, or, more clearly, $\phi' = (1+\lambda) \phi$.

The derivative of $\psi(x)=e^{x}+\lambda\int^{1}_{0}e^{x-y}\psi(y) \, dy$ is $\psi'(x) = e^{x} +\lambda\int^{1}_{0}e^{x-y}\psi(y) \, dy$, o, more clearly, $\psi' = \psi$.

The solutions are $\phi(x) = \phi(0) e^{(1+\lambda) x}$, and $\psi(x) = \psi(0) e^x$.

share|improve this answer
    
I am confused, the equation is the same, why the derivative is different? –  Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 8:10
    
Sorry, I made the mistake of copying your equation text. The upper limit of integration on the $\psi$ integral is $1$, not $x$. I have fixed it. Look at the reference you provided more carefully. –  copper.hat Jul 22 '12 at 8:12
    
Sorry, I made the mistake of copying down the wrong problem. I want to ask why we had the extra $\lambda\int^{x}_{0}e^{x-y}dy$ term in the derivative, it feels not needed. –  Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 8:13
1  
I see..I see. The Leibniz formula. –  Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 8:15
    
Thank you! Sorry to trouble you. –  Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 8:15
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.