Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given positive scalars $k_1,k_2, x_1, u_1$ and continuous non-decreasing function $f: R\to R$ with $f(0) = 0$ how to prove the existence of unique $C^2([0,x_1])$ solution of the problem:

$$u'' = k_1u'+k_2f(u)\quad \hbox{ on }\ \langle0,x_0\rangle$$ $$u(0) = 0$$ $$u(x_1) = u_1.$$

Does it imply that $u\geq 0$?

I know this is standard result, but I have difficulties with references to this result.

share|cite|improve this question
The tag differential-equations is intended for ordinary differential equations, there's no need to create a new tag. – Martin Sleziak Jul 21 '12 at 14:42

Uniqueness looks like a standard application of monotonicity. Suppose $u,v$ are two solutions. Use the ODE to show that the integral of $(u''-v'')(u-v)$ is nonnegative. On the other hand, integration by parts turns this into the integral of $-(u'-v')^2$. Hence $u\equiv v$.

For the nonnegativity, suppose $u$ attains negative minimum at some point $p$. Then $f(u(p))=0$, otherwise we already have a contradiction. But then $f(u)=0$ in a neighborhood of $p$, which reduces the equation to a linear one - with only the constant solution.

share|cite|improve this answer

If you want to proof the existence of the solution you need to use the Fixed point theorem. In your case you need to transform the differential equation to an integral equation first. I recommend you to look for a book on non linear differential equation. There you will find existence and uniqueness theorems.

share|cite|improve this answer
It's not clear to me how standard existence results apply to this boundary value problem. For instance, if you allow the constants to have arbitrary sign, the boundary value problem has completely different features. Can you please clarify what you had in mind? – Sam Lisi Aug 20 '12 at 21:08

LVK has already answered existence and the non-negativity of the solution. For existence, "shooting" works. For each parameter $\alpha \ge 0$, consider the solution to the IVP \[ \begin{split} &u'' = k_1 u' + k_2 f(u) \\ &u(0) = 0, \\ &u'(0) = \alpha. \end{split} \] Denote the unique solution to this IVP by $u_\alpha$. Then, $u_\alpha(x_1)$ is a continuous function of $\alpha$. Observe that $u_0$ is identically $0$, so $u_0(x_1) = 0$. Furthermore, by rewriting the ODE, we have \[ ( e^{-k_1 t} u' ) ' = e^{-k_1 t} k_2 f(u). \] Integrating both sides and using $f(u) \ge 0$, we get that $u_\alpha'(t) \ge \alpha$ for all $t \in [0, x_1]$. It then follows that $u_\alpha(x_1) \ge \alpha\, x_1$, so for $\alpha$ large enough, $u_\alpha(x_1) > u_1$.

The IVT gives the existence of an $\alpha$ for which a solution exists.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.