Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There are some easy products that can be written in closed form in terms of factorials:

$ 2 \times 4 \times 6 \times ... 2n = n! \times 2^n$

$ 1 \times 3 \times 5 \times ... (2n-1) = {{(2n)!} \over {n! \times 2^n}}$

$ 3 \times 6 \times 9 \times ... 3n = n! \times 3^n$

But what about these?

$ f_2(n) = 2 \times 5 \times 8 \times ... (3n+2)$

$ f_1(n) = 1 \times 4 \times 7 \times ... (3n+1)$

Wolfram Alpha gives some expressions for partial products in terms of gamma functions, but is there any way to use factorials instead?

share|cite|improve this question
$\Gamma(n+1)=n!$ – draks ... Jul 21 '12 at 13:15
yes, I know. Read the Wolfram Alpha link. The gamma function expressions involve gamma(n+4/3) or gamma(n+5/3) which are not integer factorials. – Jason S Jul 21 '12 at 13:18
The expressions involving the gamma function are actually quite clean. – lhf Jul 21 '12 at 14:36
If you aren't fond of gamma functions, you could use Pochhammer symbols instead: $f_1(n)=3^n \left(\dfrac43\right)_n$ and $f_2(n)=2\cdot 3^n \left(\dfrac53\right)_n$ – J. M. Jul 22 '12 at 9:17

In the spirit of the double factorial, where $n!!=n(n-2)(n-4)\ldots $ ending at $1$ or $2$, the same page under multifactorials suggests $n!!!$ and some other notations for what you want. But, like the double factorial, these are just notations. They are less common because the expressions are less common. You can define your third line as $f_3(n)=3 \times 6 \times 9 \times ... 3n = n! \times 3^n$ in which case you get $f_1(n)f_2(n)f_3(n)=(3n)!$ but that doesn't seem very useful.

share|cite|improve this answer
At least if you find a nice expression for $f_1$ then you'll find one for $f_2$ and vice-versa. But it seems unlikely. – lhf Jul 21 '12 at 14:42

The sequence $f_1(n)$ is tabulated at No simple closed form is given (because there surely isn't one), but a fairly nice asymptotic result is there. If that interests you, then I'm sure that $f_2(n)$ is tabulated at that site as well.

share|cite|improve this answer

To supplement lhf's supposition why an expression entirely in terms of factorials of integer argument might not be forthcoming, consider the Gauss multiplication formula for the factorial, suitably specialized:


If there were some other independent relation between $\left(n-\frac13\right)!$ and $\left(n-\frac23\right)!$, we'd be in business, but since there doesn't seem to be any...

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.