Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am wondering the link as the title implies. The Spring 87 problem in Berkeley Problems in Mathematics is as follows:

Let $V$ be a finite dimensional linear subspace of $C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})$. Assume that $V$ is closed under differentiation. Prove that there is a constant coefficient operator $$L=\sum^{n}_{k=0}a_{k}D^{k}$$ such that $V=\{f:Lf=0\}$.

I am wondering why the finite dimensional condition given would imply such a strong result. Because if we assume the required relationship the reverse is not necessarily true(the whole space is obviously closed under any differential operator), I feel something deeper may be buried in this problem I do not know. A hint or an illuminating example would be mostly welcome. I just do not know how to attack this problem.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $\{f_1,\dots,f_N\}$ a basis of $V$. Since $f'_k\in V$ for all $k$, we can write $$f'_k=\sum_{l=1}^Na_{k,l}f_l,$$ and using matrices $$\pmatrix{f'_1\\\vdots\\ f'_N}=A\pmatrix{f_1\\\vdots\\ f_N}.$$ Let $P$ the minimal polynomial of $A$ over $\Bbb R$. We can check that the differential operator $L$ associated to it is such that $V\subset \{f\mid Lf=0\}$. The general theory of differential equations ensures the converse: if $Lf=0$, then $f$ is in the vector space generated by $x^pe^{\lambda x}$, where $\lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, $m$ is the multiplicity of the root $\lambda$ in the minimal polynomial and $0\leq p\leq m$. Each of these maps are in $V$.

Note that if $V=\ker L$ for $L$ of the form $\sum_{k=0}^n a_kD^k$, where $a_k$ are constant, then $V$ is necessarily finite dimensional.

share|cite|improve this answer
A quick question - where can I find "the general theory of differential equations.."? – Bombyx mori Jul 21 '12 at 10:40
For the converse, what I meant is to use the fact that if $Lf=0$, then $f$ is in the vector space generated by $x^me^{i\lambda x}$, where $\lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, where $m$ is the multiplicity of the root $\lambda$ in the minimal polynomial. Each of these maps are in $V$. – Davide Giraudo Jul 21 '12 at 11:02
Davide, if this is so, then assuming we have $n-2$ different eigenvalues and 1 eigenvalue of multiplicty 2. By your answer we would have only $n-1$ $f_{i}$s available. Do you mean $x^{i}e^{i\lambda x}$ with $1\le i\le m$? – Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 6:34
OIn fact I don't know why I wrote $i$ in the exponential, and yes we have to take the powers of lower degree. I will edit it. Thanks! – Davide Giraudo Jul 22 '12 at 9:10
Davide, if so then we would have $0,1...m$ together $m+1$ basis vectors. – Bombyx mori Jul 22 '12 at 21:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.