Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is Descartes' theorem failing here?

I was doing a simple question :

Three circles of equal radii, equal to $1$ unit are touching each other. Find the radius of circle circumscribing the three circles.

My answer: Radius of circumcircle of triangle formed by joining the centre of the three smaller circles is $$2(√3/2)(2/3) = 2/√3$$

so, radius of circle circumscribing the three circle will be $$(2/√3) + 1$$ which is correct as per the book.

Then I thought of applying Descartes' theorem, which gave me $$1/(3+2√3)$$ which is wrong.

Am I committing any mistake? Why not both the answers are same? Please help.

share|cite|improve this question

Descartes' theorem gives the curvature of the outer circle as $3\pm 2\sqrt{3}$, with a negative value indicating a circle that circumscribes the others. So in this case, the radius is $-1/(3-2\sqrt 3)$, which turns out to be equal to the answer you got by the first method.

share|cite|improve this answer
Got my mistake, thank you sir. – Hyperbola Jul 21 '12 at 8:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.