Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am experiencing what I think is really simple confusion.

Take $y(t) = \sin(2 \cdot \pi \cdot t \cdot\omega(t))$ and $\omega(t) = a \cdot t+b$ for $t \in [0,p)$ and let $\omega(t)$ have a periodic extension with period $p$. The values $a,b,p$ are parameters

$\omega(t)$ looks like the blue function herealt text

with $\omega$ as such, $y(t)$ should be two chirps -- a sine wave whose frequency sweeps. My intuition is that the two chirps should be identical, but they're not. The second chirp is higher in frequency. The argument to $\sin$ , the quantity $2 \cdot \pi \cdot t \cdot \omega(t)$ looks like the blue function here:alt text

Two piecewise quadratics. The second quadratic should just be a shifted version of the first one, which is what is depicted in red. I can't argue with the math, but there is something very simple wrong with my intuition. The function $\omega$ should modulate the "instantaneous frequency" of the sinewave.

share|improve this question
1  
If you want the instantaneous frequency to be $\omega(t)$, the argument to $\sin$ should be $2\pi\int_0^t\omega(\tau)d\tau$. This is equal to your $2\pi t\omega$ when $\omega$ is constant, but not otherwise. –  Rahul Jan 13 '11 at 5:34
    
@Rahul Thank you! My intuition was broken and I should have remembered this from my signals book. –  Gus Jan 13 '11 at 5:43
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

It seems my comment has answered the question, so I suppose I should turn it into an actual answer.

For a chirp signal of the form $\sin(2\pi\phi(t))$, the instantaneous frequency $\omega(t)$ is the time derivative of the instantaneous phase $\phi(t)$. So for given $\omega(t)$, your signal should be $\sin\left(2\pi\int_0^t\omega(\tau)d\tau\right)$.

For what it's worth, the incorrect expression $\sin(2\pi t\omega(t))$ gives a signal with instantaneous frequency $\omega(t) + t\omega'(t)$. In your example, $\omega'(t)$ is positive almost everywhere, which is why the signal seems to be too high in frequency.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.