Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $E$ and $F$ be complex Banach spaces. We denote by $\overline{E}$ the compex conjugate of $E$, that is, the vector space $E$ with the same norm but with the conjugate multiplication by a complex scalar. The identity map defines a natural antilinear isomorphism $ x\to \overline{x}$ from $E$ onto $\overline{E}$. Recall that if $S\colon E\to F$ is a linear map we can define $\overline{S}\colon \overline{E} \to \overline{F}$ by $\overline{S}(\overline{x})=\overline{S(x)}$.

Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space. Let $T\colon H \to E$ be a bounded linear map. Do we have $$ \vert\vert T \vert\vert_{H \rightarrow E}^2=\vert\vert T\overline{T^*}\colon \overline{E^*} \rightarrow E\vert\vert\ ? $$ where $T^*\colon E^* \to H^*$ is the adjoint map.

share|cite|improve this question
What is $\overline{T^\ast}$? Or do you mean, $\overline{T\circ T^\ast}$ rather than $T\circ\overline{T^\ast}$? – leftaroundabout Jul 16 '12 at 10:18
The map $\overline{T^*}\colon \overline{E^*} \to \overline{H^*}=H$ is the conjugate of the adjoint of $T$. – Zouba Jul 16 '12 at 10:35
up vote 0 down vote accepted

This is true even in operator space setting. See proposition 7.2 in Introduction to operator space theory. G. Pisier

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.