Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking at this following equation

$\dot{x} = \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{x^2}{x^2 + 1} - rx$,

and trying to classify the bifurcations that appear when the parameter $r$ is varied. I'm pretty much following the terminology of Strogatz. Questions:

1) For $r = 0$, there's an unstable fixed point at $x = 0$, but this becomes stable as r is increased. Am I right in saying that this is a transcritical bifurcation, ie. one with the normal form $\dot{x} = rx - x^2$?

2) For $0 < r < 1/2$ there are two fixed points - one stable, one unstable - that come closer together as $r$ increases and meet at $x = 1$ when $r = 1/2$. Am I right in saying this is a saddle-node bifurcation, ie. normal form $\dot{x} = r - x^2$?

I would like to show the two above statements, but I can't quite get it to work. I'm thinking something along the lines of a Taylor expansion around $x = 0$ and $x = 1$.

Cheers! \T

EDIT: OK, the first question is actually pretty straight forward when you look at the Taylor expansion...

The second one is trickier though. Around $x = 1$, my Taylor expansion of $\dot{x}$ looks like this:

$\dot{x} \approx 1/2 + \frac{x-1}{2} - 1/4(x-1)^2 -r(x-1) - r$.

Does this resemble the normal form $\dot{x} = r - x^2$ ? (Signs and factors don't matter).

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

When a stable and an unstable fixed point collide and annihilate, that's not a pitchfork, it's a saddle-node bifurcation. A pitchfork has three fixed points coming together on one side of the critical $r$ and one on the other side.

EDIT: If $r = s + 1/2$ and $x = y - 2 s + 1 $, your Taylor expansion becomes $$ \dot{y} = \dot{x} = - y^2/4 - s + s^2$$ A further transformation can make $-s + s^2$ into $-s$ near $0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
That's what I meant, edited! – trolle3000 Jul 15 '12 at 22:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.