Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given random observations $x$, from a random variable $\mathcal{X}$, we have two different distributions under two hypothesis. \begin{align} \mathcal{H}_0: \mathcal{X}\sim K_1\\ \mathcal{H}_1: \mathcal{X}\sim K_2 \end{align} The likelihood ratio for one observation is defined as \begin{equation} L(x)=\frac{p(x|\mathcal{H}_1)}{p(x|\mathcal{H}_0)} \end{equation} and false alarm and miss detection probabilities are defined as \begin{align} P_F=\int_{\{x: L>\gamma\}}p(x| \mathcal{H}_0)dx\\ P_M=\int_{\{x: L<\gamma\}}p(x| \mathcal{H}_1)dx\\ \end{align} where $\gamma$ is the threshold which is a real number.

Changing the threshold between $-\infty$ and $\infty$ we obtain a set of $P_F$ and $P_M$ which provides a convex function $f$ for $P_M=f(P_F)$.

I wonder if it is possible to change $f$ via $y=g(x)$. I know that it is impossible to lower $P_F+P_M$ at any point on $f$.

Is it possible to lower some $P_F$ with the help of $g$ while allowing some $P_M$ to be larger compared to the case where we have no $g$?

It is also impossible if $g$ is deterministic so my question should focus on some random $g$.

Thank you very much for reading this post. Please feel free to edit since I have inet only on my mobile leading some unavoidable errors.

share|improve this question
1  
Please don't use abbreviations in question titles. What does "ROC" mean? –  Henning Makholm Jul 14 '12 at 16:38
1  
Are you assuming $L$ is a monotone function? –  Michael Hardy Jul 14 '12 at 17:28
    
@HenningMakholm : I suspect the "OC" means "operating characteristic". I probably knew at some point what the "R" is. –  Michael Hardy Jul 14 '12 at 17:29
    
ROC: receiver operating characteristics. Yes $L$ should be monotonous. I think question should be correct now. –  Seyhmus Güngören Jul 14 '12 at 17:42
    
Please see the edit for $P_F$ and $P_M$. I don't think it changes something but it is perhaps mathematically more correct. –  Seyhmus Güngören Jul 14 '12 at 22:10
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Since Likelihood ratio test $L(x)$ provides the lower bound on the $ROC$ curve, For a given $P_F$ no randomization can provide $P_M^{'}$ that is lower compared to the case where there is no randomization $P_M$. Therefore $g$ can reshape the $ROC$ if for all $P_F$ when $P_M^{'}>P_M$. This makes no sense because the tests other than $L(x)$ can also achieve sub-optimal {$P_F$,$P_M$}

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.