Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $T$ be a surjective, continuous linear operator between two Banach spaces $E$ and $F$. Assume that it is $B_F(y_0,4c)\subset \overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$, where $c>0$, $y_0 \in F$ ($B$ is for "ball", the line means "closure"). Using Minkowski addition, we get

$$ B(0,4c) \subset \overline{T(B_E(0,1))} + \overline{T(B_E(0,1))}. $$

Is $B(0,4c)$ included in the single $\overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$ too?

share|improve this question
You can remove the constant $4$, which is useless (I guess it comes from a proof of the open mapping theorem). At least, we have the more accurate inclusion $B(0,c)\subset y_0+\overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$. –  Davide Giraudo Jul 13 '12 at 19:04
The proof goes on by proving that $B(0,4c) \subset \overline{T(B_E(0,1))} + \overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$ implies $B(0,4c) \subset 2\overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$ (applying convexity) and so $B(0,2c) \subset \overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$. But I was not interested in the final result (contained in your message), I just want to know if the inclusion holds if we consider just one $\overline{T(B_E(0,1))}$. –  Flast9 Jul 14 '12 at 11:24

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes. More generally, the following is true: if $K$ is a convex centrally symmetric subset of a normed space and $B(y,r) \subset K$, then $B(0,r) \subset K$.

Indeed, by symmetry we have $B(-y,r) \subset K$. If $z\in B(0,r)$ then both $z+y$ and $z-y$ belong to $K$. By convexity $z\in K$.

I guess the reason people usually don't bother with this argument is that the Minkowski sum approach is quicker.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.