Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Fourier series of a function $f: G \to \mathbb C$ where $G$ is a group is the representation of $f$ in terms of characters $\chi_g \in \mathrm{Hom}(G, S^1)$ of $G$.

I understand the case where $G$ is finite and discrete. Now I'm trying to generalise to periodic functions on $\mathbb R$ but I'm not so sure what I'm thinking is correct.

If $f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb C$ is a $[-R,R]$-periodic function, we set $G = \mathbb R / 2R\mathbb Z \cong [0, 2R)$. Then since $f$ is $2R$-periodic we can shift this by $R$ consider $G = [-R, R)$, makes no difference.

In the discrete case $|G|=n$ the characters are $e^{\frac{2 \pi i k}{n}}$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$.

Now for some reason, the characters are $e^{i kx}$ for all $k \in \mathbb Z$. How do I see that these are the characters of $[-R,R)$?

share|improve this question
    
I'm not sure what sort of equivalence you mean by $\mathbb R/2R\mathbb R\cong [0,2R)$. The first is a topological group (which is what allows us to find characters) while the second is not, and the two are not even homeomorphic or homotopy equivalent as topological spaces. –  Alex Becker Jul 13 '12 at 15:31
    
@AlexBecker I meant "group isomorphism". –  Matt N. Jul 13 '12 at 15:32
1  
But it's unclear to me what the group operation would look like on that. And since the standard topologies on the two are non-homeomorphic, it's not an isomorphism of topological groups, so for the purposes of Fourier analysis the two are different. –  Alex Becker Jul 13 '12 at 15:36
    
@AlexBecker The group operation on $[0,2R)$ is addition mod $2R$. Ok, then my question remains : ) –  Matt N. Jul 13 '12 at 15:42
1  
Not if we give $[0,1)$ the subspace topology from $\mathbb R$, as it is then noncompact and simply connected while the circle is compact and not simply connected. The difference is that in $[0,1)$ points in small neighborhoods of $1$ are not in small neighborhoods of $0$. –  Alex Becker Jul 13 '12 at 18:06
show 1 more comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

What you have is equivalent to the circle group $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$, and its characters are indeed $e^{ikx}$ for $k\in \mathbb Z$. It is easy to verify that these are continuous group homomorphisms from $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ to itself (which is the definition of a character). To see that these are all characters of $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$, suppose that $f:\mathbb R/\mathbb Z\to \mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ is a continuous homomorphism. Assume first $f$ is increasing. Let $k$ be the degree of $f$ and note that we can lift $f$ to a map $g:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ with $g(x)=f(x)+k\lfloor x\rfloor$. The map $g$ is in fact a continuous homomorphism, as if $\{x\}+\{y\}<1$ ($\{\cdot\}$ denotes fractional part) then $$g(x+y)=f(x+y)+k\lfloor x+y\rfloor= f(x)+f(y) + k\lfloor x\rfloor + k\lfloor y\rfloor=g(x)+g(y)$$ and otherwise $$g(x+y)=f(x+y)+k\lfloor x+y\rfloor=f(x)+f(y)-\lim\limits_{x\to 1^-}g(x) + k\lfloor x\rfloor + k\lfloor y\rfloor+k=g(x)+g(y)$$ as $\lim\limits_{x\to 1^-} g(x)=k$, which also proves continuity. Restricting our attention to $\mathbb Q$ we see that $n\cdot g(m/n)=g(m)=km$ so $g(m/n)=km/n$, thus $g|_{\mathbb Q}(x)=kx$. By continuity we have that $g(x)=kx$ on $\mathbb R$, and it follows that $f(x)=kx$. Viewing the circle as the group of unit complex numbers, this is $e^{ikx}$. Similarly, if $f$ is decreasing we get $e^{-ikx}$. Thus the characters of $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ are $e^{ikx}$ for $k\in\mathbb Z$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.