Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the process of studying irreducibility of polynomials, I encountered the criterion that $p(x)$ is irreducible if and only if $p(x-c)$ is irreducible. When trying to determine what properties of the ring were preserved under this map $x \mapsto (x-c)$, which appears sometimes to be called the shift isomorphism, I read that it was an isomorphism of the polynomial ring $R[x]$, but my attempts to prove that fact only led me through some difficult calculations, at which I generally fail.

So how does one prove that the map is an isomorphism of $R[x]$? Is it an isomorphism for all rings $R$ and for any number of variables?

Is this just a specific case of a more general phenomenon?

share|cite|improve this question
What part are you finding it hard to prove? – Chris Eagle Jul 12 '12 at 21:29
Please share your failed attempts! – wildildildlife Jul 12 '12 at 21:52
My attempt at a proof began by defining the map which sends $x$ to $x-c$ and is the identity on R. Then I tried to show that the map was a homomorphism, and the calculations, which involved lots of summations and binomial coefficients and whatnot, seemed intractable to me. I rarely see such awful proofs. Usually there is a much cleaner way to prove anything. – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jul 12 '12 at 22:55
@PrimeRibeyeDeal For the proof, see my answer. – M Turgeon Jul 12 '12 at 22:58
@MTurgeon Yes, thanks. I am currently reading a proof of the theorem you gave. – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jul 12 '12 at 23:07
up vote 5 down vote accepted

As Lubin noted in a comment above, the first thing to check is that the map which sends $p(x)$ to $p(x-c)$ is indeed a ring homomorphism. To do this, we have the following tool:

Theorem: Let $R$ be a commutative ring. The polynomial ring $R[X]$ satisfies the following universal property: given a commutative ring $A$ containing $R$ and an element $a$ of $A$, there is a unique ring homomorphism $$\phi:R[X] \to A$$ such that $\phi(X)=a$.

(Note that there exists a similar version for the polynomial ring in finitely many variables.) Hence, by this universal property there exists a unique ring homomorphism that sends $X$ to $X-c$, for any $c\in R$. And as azarel noted above, this is in fact a ring isomorphism, since you have an inverse (namely, $X\mapsto X+c$).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks. This is essentially what I was looking for: a general fact I can cart around in my head, and one that brings me closer to understanding the "algebraic relations" that polynomials embody. – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jul 12 '12 at 23:38

Hmmm...what about directly? $$f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n\,,\,g(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty b_nx^n\,\in R[x]$$ with $\,\,a_n=b_n=0 \,\,\text{ for all but a finite number of indices}$ . Since $$f(x)+g(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (a_n+b_n)x^n\,\,,\,f(x)g(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\sum_{k=0}^na_kb_{n-k}\right)x^n$$ we get that, denoting the map by$\,\phi(x):=x-c\,$, we have $$\phi(f+g)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (a_n+b_n)(x-c)^n=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(x-c)^n+\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(x-c)^n=\phi(f)+\phi(g)$$ $$\phi(fg)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left( \sum_{k=0}^n a_kb_{n-k}\right)(x-c)^n=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(x-c)^n\sum_{n=0}^\infty b_n(x-c)^n=\phi(f)\phi(g)$$

Remember: all the above are in fact finite sums, so we can re-arrange them as we wish. Also, $\,\phi(r)=r\,\,\,\forall\,r\in R\,$, so in particular $\,\phi(1)=1\,$ .

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, I very much appreciate you writing this out explicitly. I perpetrated most of the same calculations when I originally embarked, but I fell apart at the middle equality in the line where you show the preservation of multiplicative structure. Perhaps I could see the implication on a day my brain feels more energetic, but is there some way you could make it slightly easier to see? – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jul 12 '12 at 23:35
Yes @PrimeRibeyeDeal: write it down carefully! For example, let's do the first ones: $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\sum_{k=0}^n a_nb_{n-k}\right)(x-c)^n=a_0b_0+(a_0b_1+a_1b_0)(x-c)+(a_0b_2+a_1b_1+a_2b_0)(x-c)‌​^2+...$$and now write down the other expression separately – DonAntonio Jul 12 '12 at 23:57
Ok, thank you very much. – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jul 13 '12 at 14:18

Hint: The map $x\to x+c$ is his inverse.

share|cite|improve this answer
And one needs to show that these maps preserve both addition and multiplication, etc. – Lubin Jul 12 '12 at 21:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.