Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Proof for $a\in (0,1)$ that $a\to F(a)= \log\left(\lVert f\lVert_{1/a}\right)$ is a convex map, if $f\in L^p(X)$ for all $p\geq1$ in some measure space $(X,\mu)$.

I'd like to prove that for all $a_1,a_2\in(0,1)$ and $t\in[0,1]$ the following holds: \begin{align} F(t a_1+(1-t)a_2)\leq t F(a_1)+(1-t)F(a_2)\end{align} using the properties of the logarithm yields $F(a)=a \log\left(\int_X \lvert f\lvert^{1/a}\right)$. Plugging this in the above inequality reads \begin{align} (t a_1+(1-t)a_2)\log\left( \int_X \lvert f\lvert^{1/(t a_1+(1-t)a_2)}\right)\leq\\ t a_1 \log\left( \int_X \lvert f\lvert^{1/a_1}\right)+(1-t)a_2 \log\left( \int_X \lvert f\lvert^{1/a_2}\right)\end{align}

Is the $\log$ on the LHS dominated by those on the RHS? I don't know why? How can I continue? Apply Hölder?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $a_1, a_2\in (0,1)$ and $t\in(0,1)$, then by Hölder inequality with $$ p=\frac{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}{ta_1}\quad\text{ and }\quad q=\frac{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}{(1-t)a_2} $$ we get $$ \int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{1}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}d\mu= \int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{t}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}|f|^{\frac{1-t}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}d\mu \leq \left(\int\limits_X \left(|f|^{\frac{t}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}\right)^{\frac{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}{ta_1}}d\mu\right)^{\frac{ta_1}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}\left(\int\limits_X \left(|f|^{\frac{1-t}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}\right)^{\frac{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}{(1-t)a_2}}d\mu\right)^{\frac{(1-t)a_2}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}= \left(\int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{1}{a_1}}d\mu\right)^{\frac{ta_1}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}\left(\int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{1}{a_2}}d\mu\right)^{\frac{(1-t)a_2}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}} $$ Hence $$ \left(\int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{1}{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}}d\mu\right)^{ta_1+(1-t)a_2}\leq \left(\int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{1}{a_1}}d\mu\right)^{ta_1}\left(\int\limits_X |f|^{\frac{1}{a_2}}d\mu\right)^{(1-t)a_2} $$ After taking lorarithms we see that the this inequality is equivalent to $$ F(t a_1+(1-t)a_2)\leq tF(a_1)+(1-t)F(a_2) $$ Hence $F$ is convex.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.