Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $R$ is a finite ring (with identity) but not a field, let $U(R)$ be its group of units. Is $\frac{|U(R)|}{|R|}$ bounded away from $1$ over all such rings?

It's been a while since I cracked an algebra book (well, other than trying to solve this recently), so if someone can answer this, I'd prefer not to stray too far from first principles within reason.

share|improve this question
    
What do you mean by "bounded away from 1"? –  user26857 Jul 12 '12 at 12:40
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 19 down vote accepted

$\mathbb{F}_p \times\mathbb{F}_q$ has $(p-1)(q-1)$ invertible elements, so no.

Since $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ has $1$ invertible element, the proportion is also not bounded away from $0$.

share|improve this answer
1  
Wow, you guys are good -- I might have hit upon that, but not this fast! –  Vandermonde Jul 10 '12 at 1:41
add comment

The bound given by navigetor23 is tight for example in the case $R=\mathcal{O}/\langle p^2\rangle$, where $\mathcal{O}$ is the ring of integers of a finite unramified extension of the $p$-adic numbers of degree $n$: $|R|=p^{2n}$ and there are $p^n$ non-units consisting of the cosets in $p\mathcal{O}$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

By the way, the number $\# U(R)/ \#R$ equals $\sum_{\mathfrak{m}} \left(1-\frac{1}{\# R/\mathfrak{m}}\right)$, where the sum ranges over all maximal ideals $\mathfrak{m} \subseteq R$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.