Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Milnor and Stasheff, it is taken as part of the first axiom that all Stiefel-Whitney classes of a bundle vanish in dimensions greater than the rank of the bundle. However, in other sources this is omitted. The wikipedia article makes it seem like this is actually a result of the axioms. Is there a simple proof of this (the axioms I am using are those listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiefel%E2%80%93Whitney_class#Axioms)?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

It is certainly both of constructions of the Stiefel-Whitney classes that I know. The construction via the Thom Isomorphism and the Steenrod operations clearly must vanish seeing as the Thom class of the bundle will be in a dimension that is killed by the Steenrod Operation because of instability.

For the construction via universal bundles you look at the universal rank $k$-bundle $\gamma_k$, it has $w_n(\gamma_k)=0$ simply by looking at the cohomology of $BO(k)$, there isn't a polynomial generator in that dimension. The above observation coupled with naturality should give the result, but i don't know if that should count as following from the axioms.

I can flesh this out a bit later if you like.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer! I am wondering though if there is a more direct proof from the axioms (instead of going through a construction and proving uniqueness). –  Eric O. Korman Jan 9 '11 at 23:36
    
I understand completely. Hopefully, someone will come by with an answer. –  Sean Tilson Jan 10 '11 at 2:41
    
Also, it should be pointed out that it could be a mistake in the wikipedia entry... –  Sean Tilson Jan 10 '11 at 2:42
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.